Law Professor Richard L. Hasen has this article mulling over the arguments for and against having the United States switch to a parliamentary system.
Law Professor Richard L. Hasen has this article mulling over the arguments for and against having the United States switch to a parliamentary system.
Is Hasen one of THE most dangerous MORONS in the U.S.A. at the moment ???
Tyranny by definition = legislative, executive and judicial powers in the same persons.
Parlimentary systems = legislative and executive powers in the same persons = 2/3 tyrants.
See the EVIL U.K. regime with its powermad MONSTERS — and the many ROTTED to the CORE parliamentary regimes in Europe, Asia, Africa, etc.
——-
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.
NO vetoes.
Max. separation of powers.
Professor Hasen did not come out in favor of making the change. He just explores the arguments pro and con. He concludes that he would not make the change.
Perhaps Prof. Hasen never heard about the 4 July 1776 DOI ???
— and its blasts at the EVIL Brit regime with its EVIL hereditary monarchy and its EVIL parliamentary system — rotten boroughs in the Brit House of Commons and the hereditary House of so-called *Lords*.
Gee – See the separation of powers in the 1776 State Constitutions.
See the *celebrated* Montesquieu – Spirit of the Laws — causing separation of powers to get a whole lot of attention.
BUT — this is the New Age of MORONS in all sorts of places — i.e. closet TYRANTS with their EVIL quick fix schemes — such as even thinking about parliamentary regimes in the U.S.A.
— as if the powermad control freaks as Prez, Guv, Mayors are not EVIL bad enough if they were also in the Congress or a State legislature or a city council.
SEE the appointed Prime Minister HITLER in the 1933 German Reichstag (aka Parliament) and his subversion of the 1919 Germany Constitution with the resulting 1933-1945 tyranny in Germany and about 70 MILLION dead in 1939-1945 — World War II.
All sorts of MORONS learned NOTHING from the Hitler events — i.e. the timebomb parliamentary systems were kept around in Europe, etc. after 1945.
Having parlimentary regimes is like asking for political mass suicide.
Scholarly work? Look no further than 1 and 3 above.
A bit more – see the ROT of the parliamentary regimes in the U.K. and France (especially) in 1931-1939 — being paralyzed by Hitler and his march towards WW II.
See the Second World War, Vol. 1, the Gathering Storm – by Winston S. Churchill. See the various WC mentions of *party politics* — like a card game among the morons.
It took the Hitler wipeout of the Czech regime in early 1939 (after the infamous EVIL 1938 Munich scheme/deal) for the top MORON parliamentary Brits to go to war crisis thinking and action
— i.e. BARELY having enough Brit fighter planes/pilots in Jul-Sep 1940 to defeat Hitler in the Battle of Britai — and thus BARELY saving Western Civilization.