U.S. Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case on Requiring Small Groups who Support or Oppose Ballot Measures to File Campaign Reports

On November 4, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Worley v Detzner, 13-333. The lower court had upheld a Florida law that required groups that spend as little as $500 either supporting or opposing a ballot measure to file campaign disclosure reports, both initially and then periodically.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case on Requiring Small Groups who Support or Oppose Ballot Measures to File Campaign Reports — No Comments

  1. So if you are a big corporation with millions of dollars to spend, you are free to do so with little to no interference from the government, but if you and your neighbors wish to spend a few hundred dollars, you are screwed. Sounds about right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.