The American Political Science Association has appointed a task force to study negotiating agreement in politics. A sub-group, charged with investigating the causes and consequences of polarization, has issued this 35-page report. It is authored by Michael Barber and Nolan McCarty.
The report examines various explanations for polarization, including: (1) a polarized electorate; (2) southern realignment; (3) gerrymandering; (4) primary elections; (5) economic inequality; (6) money in politics; (7) media environment; (8) changes internal to Congress, such as rules changes, majority party agenda control, party pressures, and the breakdown of bi-partisan norms.
Michael Barber and Nolan McCarty are both at Princeton University. Barber is a PhD candidate whose dissertation, “Political Ideology, Campaign Contributions, and Legislative Polarization” is in the process of becoming a book. McCarthy is a political science professor and has written the book, “Polarized America: the Dance of Political Ideology and Unequal Riches”. He is the author of several other books as well.
The conclusion to the APSA sub-group study includes this sentence: “The evidence undermines the common arguments that reforming legislative districting or primary elections will materially reduce polarization.” Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.
100 percent PACK/CRACK gerrymander districts.
The extremist polarized robot party hack voters in the PACK/CRACK districts nominate the extremist robot party hacks who later get elected – esp. in the about 95 plus percent one party SAFE SEAT districts – aka CONCENTRATION CAMPS – with or without barbed wire / electric fences
— think the Stalin/Hitler slave/death camps.
1/2 votes x 1/2 districts = 1/4 control.
Much, much, much worse primary math.
How soon before Civil W-A-R II — esp. between the LOOTERS versus the Tax Slaves ???
—-
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.
http://www.apsanet.org/negotiatingagreement/
More publish or perish stuff by mini armies of polsci profs ???
Any prof reports in 1761-1774 or in 1854-1860 just before things really happened in 1775 and 1861 ???
Clue – think gerrymanders in both years.
False equivalencies and objectivism.