On January 17, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission issued a 46-page ruling, finding that Arizona, Georgia, and Kansas requests to alter the federal voter registration form are denied. The Commission first determines that it has jurisdiction to adjudicate the states’ requests. Then, it evaluates the evidence put forward by the states in support of their request, and finds the evidence unconvincing.
The three states want additional proof that applicants who use the federal form are citizens, other than a signature under penalty of perjury. The EAC ruling says that Arizona and Kansas still accept sworn statements as sufficient for certain election-related purposes, such as changes of address, or an application that the voter is disabled and therefore qualifies for an automatic mail ballot. The EAC also quotes from Arizona election officials who themselves, in the past, have expressed the opinion that an illegal alien is unlikely to register to vote because that would subject that alien to a felony conviction. See pages 27-32.
The usual suspects continue their nonstop ATTACK on the USA Constitution.
For the brain dead —
4 July 1776 DOI
The 13 new NATION-STATE regimes quickly have ALLEGIANCE oaths and purges of British loyalists.
The adults having ALLEGIANCE to the new State regimes via the DOI become the instant Citizens of such States.
ALL others are aliens – with any British loyalists in the new States being ENEMY ALIENS in the 1776-1783 American Revolutionary W-A-R.
The 1776-1789 States pass naturalization laws for foreign folks who declare ALLEGIANCE to the State regimes.
First USA naturalization law in 1790.
THUS – 14th Amdt, Sec. 1 Citizens in the States have an ALLEGIANCE chain connection to the DOI and later 1787 Const via their natural born or naturalized Citizen FATHERS.
Place of birth means ZERO.
LEGAL PROOF of the ALLEGIANCE chain connection is required to be a LEGAL registered/qualified Elector in any State — noting all sorts of dubious/BAD records until very recently.
Of course, the usual suspect 666 ENEMIES of Democracy want lots of INVADER aliens voting in marginal gerrymander districts to be able to TAKE OVER the USA regime — to enact the usual suspects agenda of control freak STATISM — esp. leftwing versions.
This ruling will help electors in California
Qualified Political Parties that registered after the effective date of the Subdivision
containing the current Subsection # 2151(d)
of the California Elections Code.
Question for Richard Winger, A look on line
only shows Elections Code Division 2 divided
in to Chapters. What “Subdivision” does Section 2151 belong in, since I can not locate same on line?
Currently those California Electors using the
registration cards issued by the County Election Officers and/or the CA SofS, only
show a “party preference” which is not the
same as “intending to affiliate” with a
qualified political party for the purpose
of Elections Code Subsection 5100(b), making
those electors not members of the qualified
political party and therefore, not counted
in the total to establish the 1% registration requirements to keep these parties qualified
after the November, 2014 election.
Since AB 1170 failed in committee, the only hope for the Green, Libertarian, & Peace &
Freedom Parties is to locate those electors
that registered on or after January 1, 2011
and re-register them with these Federal registration form, since
those forms were created in 2006 and show a membership in the political parties under Subsection 5100(b), because of the dicta
in California Democratic Party v. Jones.
A good project is would be to post what the
registration by County was on December 31, 2010 with the next figure in the Statement
of Vote issued by the SofS. This would help
the County Central Committees on a re-registration of non-affiliated declared elector with a party preference, so they can
build up membership in the several qualified
political party by the time that Secretary of
State acts post the November, 2014 election
on the 1% rule. The 2% rule has become of
not effect, because there is only a “top-two”
General Election with a non-party statewide
primary in June, 2014.
Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman,
American Independent Party of California
Place of Birth does not have a “zero”
meaning. Let’s take U. S. Senator John
McCain III, who was born at the Colon
Hospital on Colon Island in the Republic of Panama in 1936. He had parents that were not married prior to his birth. The purported claimed marriage by the senator in a bar in TJ of Baja California, Mexico is just like the claims of Ike and Tina
Turner, not a lawful marriage, because
they were not married in the Office of the Civil Registry in Baja California
under the laws of the State of Baja California.
Therefore, John McCain III was not included in the 1937 collective naturalization act for a child of a
United States Citizen born in the Republic of Panama with a parent
employed by the United States Government at the time of birth, because the parents must be lawfully
wed prior to the time of birth.
Location does make a difference also with American Indians and Native Alaskans, because if a Indian or Eskimo child is born outside of the
United States they do not get Citizenship, like other United States
Citizen children having a United States Citizen Parent born in a location outside of the United States
but not in the Republic of Panama.