Anouar Majid Says U.S. Needs a Multi-Party System

Anouar Majid has this op-ed in the Portland Press Herald (Maine), saying that the United States would have better government if it had a multi-party system. Majid is the author of many books, and the founder of the Moroccan-American magazine Tingis, and the founder of the Center for Global Humanities. Thanks to the Independent Voters Network for the link.


Comments

Anouar Majid Says U.S. Needs a Multi-Party System — 4 Comments

  1. Everyone wants competition among politicians to prove who are the best team players, and pure proportional representation (PR) is the perfect tool for the ebb and flow of votes for those in competition for votes.

    The USA and International Parliaments’ are composed of people who are interested in a unifying voting system.

    We don’t need to waste time on fussing and fighting, and we don’t even like to hear about that because we’re too busy having a good time being satisfied with working together as a big team.

    You too are invited and welcomed and when you decide that unity is stronger than fighting, be sure to sign up. The worst thing we can say to you is “What took you so long?”

    Our team is confident, correct and nobody has it as good as our team.

    Our best team players are working tirelessly every day and we have the best maneuvers and largest far-reaching coalition of team players than anyone.

    Just look at the web page to learn more and see the proof. The votes have been posted for transparency for twenty years, continues to grow day by day and we’re always a few inches ahead of everyone and in perfect form.

    http://www.international-parliament.org/
    http://www.usparliament.org/

  2. Exactly where does the US parliament have ANY REAL power and jurisdiction to enact and enforce LAWS ???

    On the Moon, on Mars, etc. ???

  3. Demo Rep, thank you for your question.

    With team psychology, we don’t claim to have “ANY REAL power”, nor would we make such claims which would be an “over-sell”.

    We are underdogs and we only under-sell and over perform.

    We are a sub-atomic-sized entity which works incredibly efficient with microscopic amounts of data or large. And since votes are concrete pieces of information, our handling and counting of the data works perfectly on small or large levels.

    The information and unity psychology on which we have an exclusive, is where our most potential lies. Information is free and abstract. Our unity is far beyond in scope of information that is generated from plurality voting systems.

    It’s through this democratic legitimacy which gives us the strength to accomplish far more incredible goals on day to day activities for the 100%, far more good things than ever possible with any plurality election can do.

    We get things done behind the scenes every day and our members of in close communication as team players but since we are small we don’t flaunt our accomplishments. When people are interested then they can join the effort and learn more, but every iota of information about our strengths isn’t being published on Ballot Access News.

    As you know, BAN is interested in all the fighting, and the news about things accomplished by our team isn’t of interest nor understood by them or the readers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.