On May 5, the plaintiff in Koller v Brown, n.d., 5:16cv-7069, filed this 29-page brief in their lawsuit to overturn the California law that tells presidential electors they must vote for the presidential candidate who carried their state.
On May 5, the plaintiff in Koller v Brown, n.d., 5:16cv-7069, filed this 29-page brief in their lawsuit to overturn the California law that tells presidential electors they must vote for the presidential candidate who carried their state.
He makes an erroneous claim with regard to Minnesota.
Since California has no statutes for converting ballot markings into popular votes for President, does Mr. Koller have standing?
Richard:
Should the plaintiff win this case, wouldn’t it ALSO have the effect of neutralizing the Popular vote statute in California?