Two previously-introduced election law bills in the California legislature have been amended to change the rules for recall petitions. See this story. The authors of the bills, AB 132 and SB 117, are Democrats who hope to prevent the recall of State Senator Josh Newman. The recall petition already has enough valid signatures, but the bills would let voters remove their names from the recall petition.
The State Court of Appeals in Sacramento already invalidated another such bill, SB 96, in the lawsuit Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v Padilla. That decision said SB 96 is invalid (at least as to the recall provisions) because the State Constitution requires that all bills have only a single subject, and SB 96 was a budget bill.
Assuming AB 132 or SB 117 are signed into law, there is still a very strong legal case against them, because courts have ruled that it violates due process to stiffen ballot access rules right in the middle of a petition drive. This instance is even worse, because the petition is already submitted and verified. Thanks to Jim Riley for the link.
MOST gerrymander district incumbents are ANTI-Democracy H-A-C-K-S (esp since 1932) —
like the hacks-stooges in the legislative bodies under Stalin/Hitler.
PR and AppV.
Will this be Old Man Brown’s legacy?