U.S. District Court Hears Oral Arguments in Democratic Party Lawsuit on Cancelled North Carolina Judicial Primaries

On January 24, U.S. District Court Judge Catherine Eagles heard North Carolina Democratic Party v Berger, m.d., 1:17cv-1113. Here is a news story about the three-hour argument. The issue is whether North Carolina is violating the U.S. Constitution by holding partisan judicial elections, but not giving any means for a party to nominate judicial candidates.


Comments

U.S. District Court Hears Oral Arguments in Democratic Party Lawsuit on Cancelled North Carolina Judicial Primaries — 1 Comment

  1. Each party gang continues NOT to be an independent empire for election law purposes.

    Scotus Eu case 1989

    Each election is new.

    Each office is separate.

    Each office may currently be partisan or nonpartisan.

    NO constitutional *right* to have ANY PUBLIC robot party hack primaries.

    —–
    Const Amdt —

    ONE election day – NO primaries
    fixed election laws – Z days before election day — NO more last second election law machinations
    PR and AppV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.