Newspaper Describes Oral Argument in North Carolina Case over Abolition of Judicial Primaries

The Charlotte Observer describes the oral argument on January 24 in North Carolina Democratic Party v Berger, m.d., 1:17cv-1113. This is the case over whether it is unconstitutional for North Carolina to list party labels on the general election ballot for judicial office, and yet give parties no means to nominate for judicial office.


Comments

Newspaper Describes Oral Argument in North Carolina Case over Abolition of Judicial Primaries — 3 Comments

  1. What about the party labels in top 2 primary States ??? — labels selected by candidates — regardless of any other party hacks.

    again –

    PUBLIC nominations by ALL/SOME of the PUBLIC Electors/Voters by PUBLIC LAWS.

    How often would Stalin/Hitler use the nazi/communist party label respectively ???

    If they did, then so what ??? — more/less free publicity ???

  2. The example was an obvious WHAT IF item.

    ie –

    the MORON nazis would have NO complaint — IF Stalin called himself a nazi on ballots

    the MORON commies would have NO complaint — IF Hitler called himself a commie on ballots

    — just more free publicity for both gangs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.