On April 14, the New York Working Families Party overwhelmingly endorsed Cynthia Nixon for Governor instead of incumbent Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo is running for re-election this year. See this story. The WFP is now highly likely to nominate Nixon in May. That would almost certainly mean that she would be on the November ballot as the WFP nominee.
I still think Cuomo will ultimately appear on this line.
More importantly, on Monday night at Irving Plaza, Eric B & Rakim also endorsed her. See my website.
So it looks like it will be either a 4 or 5 person/party race with Cuomo(D), an undetermined sacrificial lamb(R), Howie Hawkins(G), Cynthia Nixon(WFP), and Larry Sharpe for the Libertarians. This should be interesting, someone with only 25-30% of the vote could win.
^Sorry it should say “5 or 6 person race”, because the Reform party may nominate their own candidate too.
NONPARTISAN AppV for all exec/judic offices – pending Condorcet.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/14/politics/cynthia-nixon-endorsement-working-families-party/index.html
leftwing chaos per usual — which New Age leftwinger is the best/worst demagogue communist ???
Do the surviving NY Elephants have any extra cash to DIVIDE and CONQUER the NY leftwing hoards ???
— ie Elephant cash for WFP ???
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule
ZERO NEW IN 2,500 YEARS PLUS ???
It might end up being 7 candidates if the Upstate Jobs Party manages to get a candidate on ballot.
US men who are interested in fair elections, equal treatment and multi-winner districts are uniting to elect our opposite gender by way of New York Super-state Parliament under pure proportional representation (PPR).
We especially like independents, splinter groups and alternative regular people.
But it takes time and dedication to accomplish what needs to be done.
http://www.usparliament.org/ss2.php
What are the *laws* of the usparliament regime having any criminal punishments and/or civil remedies ???
A GIANT/HUGE/BIG difference between proposed election systems and actual *governments*.
DR, the USA Parliament is like a microscopic political party whose interest is in counting votes and using parliamentary procedures under pure proportional representation (PPR).
Regarding laws about criminal activity our guidelines do have a few guideline items which address the issue but the reality is that we are organised around small stacks if paper ballots and in some case “eballots” so our focus is mostly on the ballot preparation, the team psychology of multiple winners working together and so forth, while using PPR.
We look in the mirror at our own team with microscopic issues which are not significantly connected with “real pilitics”.
Real politics viciously oppose talk about the unifying psychology of PPR so our team is continually battered and slandered by egomaniacs who only care about single-winner power grabs and who have no use for PPR.
*parliament* has had a GOVERNMENT connection since early in the DARK AGE – ie in France and England especially — circa 800-1000 years ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament
How about USA PPR committee/group ???
See the CA Citizens for PR — for example.
I often visit your blog and have noticed that you don’t update it often.
More frequent updates will give your site higher rank & authority in google.
I know that writing articles takes a lot of time, but you can always help yourself with miftolo’s tools which
will shorten the time of creating an article to a few seconds.