U.S. District Court Declares that New York State’s Ban on Out-of-State Petitioners is Unconstitutional

On June 12, U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold declared that New York state’s ban on out-of-state circulators is unconstitutional. This is not surprising, because on May 18 he had enjoined the restriction. Free Libertarian Party v Spano, e.d., 1:16cv-3054.

However, in his order of June 12, he said New York will be allowed to continue to enforce the ban until November 7, 2018, because it would be too difficult for the state to come up with new procedures in a matter of weeks. The petitioning period for general election petitions starts June 19 (for federal office).


Comments

U.S. District Court Declares that New York State’s Ban on Out-of-State Petitioners is Unconstitutional — 3 Comments

  1. Each of the States in the *United* *STATES* of America is an INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE —

    1776 Declaration of Independence, last paragraph.

    1777 Articles of Confederation

    1783 U.S.A.-British Peace Treaty

    1787 U.S.A. Const. Art. VII – *establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the same.*

    States PLURAL in all 4 documents.
    —-
    INTERNAL POLITICS — EXTERNAL FOLKS STAY OUT.

    MUCH TOO DIFFICULT FOR THE MORON LAWYERS AND COURTS TO UNDERSTAND.

  2. Regarding the election procedures in every state for federal candidates, Congress may make or alter state procedures at any time. Only the Judiciary offers the states a “safe harbor” for a time in a constitutional storm. Judicial bias evident in the case favoring the state to be more devious to lay the groundwork for further litigation in the future to wear the upstart bastards down.

  3. Does the MORON judge have ANY brain cells regarding UNCONSTITUTIONAL ???

    STOP the ROT NOW – this micro-second — whatever the cost.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.