Like most states that allow write-in primaries, New Mexico sets a minimum number of votes that a write-in candidate must receive, in order to be nominated and appear on the November ballot. This year, New Mexico Libertarians running for statewide office need 230 write-in votes. It isn’t enough to just get the most votes in the primary; the minimum must be met.
The New Mexico Secretary of State’s official tally says the party’s candidate for Governor only got 175 write-in votes. See this story. Voters who cast a write-in vote are supposed to fill in the bubble on the paper ballot next to the write-in line. Otherwise the vote-counting scanner won’t count the write-in. The Libertarian Party is asking for a hand recount, which should not be very expensive because there were only about 850 voters who cast a ballot in the Libertarian primary. The party believes that if they can get a hand count, that will find more write-in votes from voters who didn’t fill in the bubble.
Courts in other states have been split over whether such write-ins can be counted. Washington and Colorado state courts ruled that they should count, but California courts ruled that they should not, although later the California law was changed to validate such write-ins if they make a difference. Thanks to Rick Lass for the link.
See the infamous Bush v Gore 2000 —
NO definition of a *legal* vote in the FL regime of total morons – legis, exec, judic.
See 2002 USA HAVA law — part written esp for such FL morons —
ALL States must have definitions of legal votes.
Thus –
legal write-in vote — marking the write-in oval AND writing in name.
As usual lawyers and judges continue to be brain dead about basic election law stuff.
LPNM has only themselves to blame. Early voting had already started before they managed to get an email out to let people know about two write-in candidates. Sometimes there just is no fix for stupid.
They only needed 230 signatures to have their names printed on the primary ballot instead of needing people to write them in and they didn’t do it? Granted they had to be 230 registered Libertarians, but still, that’s a pretty low bar.
First North Dakota, then the Arizona Gubernatorial candidate, now this. It’s like they’re not even trying.
A bit large degree of anarchy / paralysis in the LP
— worse in low voter density States
— isolation factors.