New York Files Brief in Second Circuit in Defense of Ban on Out-of-State Circulators

On October 26, the New York State Board of Elections filed this brief in the Second Circuit in Redpath v Spano, 18-2089. The case was formerly called Merced v Spano. The issue is the state’s ban on out-of-state circulators.

The state tries to argue that anyone can be a circulator, and that the law only bans out-of-state “witnesses.” In other words, the state expects every out-of-state circulator to be accompanied at all times by a New York state resident. Then the state argues that the free speech of circulators is not an issue in the case, and that witnesses have no free speech complaint because it is the other person in the team who can be expected to do all the talking.


Comments

New York Files Brief in Second Circuit in Defense of Ban on Out-of-State Circulators — 2 Comments

  1. Each State is a sovereign NATION-STATE.

    1776 DOI last para.
    1777 Arts Confed
    1783 USA-Brit Peace Treaty
    1787 Const Art VII

    States – plural in all 4 documents

    Name of USA regime —

    United *STATES* of America — States plural

    Elections = INTERNAL in each State.

    ALL non-state inhabitants — stay out.

    Too many history brain dead moron lawyers and judges to count ???

    Try to intervene in Russia so-called elections — see if you survive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.