On December 14, both California and New York finished their official election results tallies. The only state that hasn’t finished is West Virginia. The Connecticut Secretary of State’s web page says the election results listed there aren’t official, but they are official and complete except for a single legislative district, the State House 120th district. Here are the New York results. Here are the California results.
Some state election web pages prominently display the election night unofficial results, and yet those states also have the final official vote totals, but the final official vote totals are in a less prominent part of the web page, which might lead someone to think that the official final results are not there yet.
CA — 65.31 pct of voters voted by mail —
3 smaller counties — ALL vote by mail.
CA survives.
—–
UNEQUAL votes– by winner and by district for the various ANTI-Democracy gerrymander legislative bodies.
More shortly.
PR and AppV
2018 RESULT OF THE RED COMMUNIST CA GERRYMANDER COMMISSION AND THE CA TOP 2 PRIMARY.
COPY AND PASTE ON WALL.
ANTI-DEMOCRACY MINORITY RULE CONTROL PERCENTAGE IN NON-TOP 2 PRIMARY REGIMES IS ABOUT 30-31 PCT.
———-
CA ASSEMBLY [STATE REPS] 2019-2020
80 GERRYMANDER DISTRICTS –
80 CONCENTRATION CAMPS
12,712,542 TV / 80 = 158,906 AVE
1 OF 80 WIN GOT OVER AVERAGE
VOTES PCT
3,424,956 *26.9 41 LOW D* WIN
2,524,621 19.9 + 19 HIGH D WIN
5,949,577 46.8 = 60 D WIN
1,913,448 15.1 + 20 R WIN
7,863,025 61.9 = 80 WIN
3,928,948 30.9 + 76 LOSE
11,791,973 92.8 = 156 TOTAL
920,569 7.2 + NONVOTES
12,712,542 100.0 = TOTAL VOTES
* ANTI-DEMOCRACY MINORITY RULE PERCENTAGE
167,428 WINMAX
39,328 WINMIN
106,683 LOSEMAX
4.26 WINMAX/WINMIN
2.71 LOSEMAX/WINMIN
DATA-
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/prior-elections/statewide-election-results/general-election-november-6-2018/statement-vote/
—
ALL of the low win Donkeys have lots of ILLEGAL invaders in their gerrymander districts —
— who got counted in the 2010 USA Census.
NO PARTY STATS DUE TO TOP 2 PRIMARY – DISTRICTS *NOT* HAVING 1 D AND 1 R.
HOW SOON BEFORE THE DONKEYS EAT EACH OTHER IN THE CA SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC [CASSOR] ???
SEE EX-USSR REGIME.
—
PR and AppV
CA USA REPS 2019-2020
53 GERRYMANDER DISTRICTS –
53 CONCENTRATION CAMPS
12,712,542 TV / 53 = 239,859 AVE
3 OF 53 WIN GOT OVER AVERAGE
VOTES PCT
3,351,645 26.4* 27 LOW D* WIN
3,837,824 30.2 + 19 HIGH D WIN
7,189,469 56.6 = 46 D WIN
960,620 7.6 + 7 R WIN
8,150,089 64.1 = 53 WIN
4,034,433 31.7 + 53 LOSE
12,184,522 95.8 = 106 TOTAL
528,020 4.2 + NONVOTES
12,712,542 100.0 = TOTAL VOTES
* ANTI-Democracy minority rule percentage
275,292 MAXWIN
57,239 MINWIN
156,253 MAXLOSE
4.81 MAXWIN/MINWIN
2.73 MAXLOSE/MINWIN
DATA-
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/prior-elections/statewide-election-results/general-election-november-6-2018/statement-vote/
—
The CA 46 RED communist Donkey robot Reps. will be purging away in 2019-2020 in Devil City – via RED *leader* Pelosi.
Same gerrymander oligarchy ROT in ALL States.
—
PR and AppV
In California we have a non partisan group of citizens to draw legislative districts, rather than the legislature. Arnold Schwarzenegger championed ballot initiatives to do this in order to make races more competitive.
The CA gerrymander commission is a classic subverted group —
various undercover RED communist Donkeys claimed to be *nonpartisan* and got on the commission.
Result — TOTAL rigged gerrymander districts.
Mich voters just got brainwashed into having a copy of the CA gerrymander commission.
Math fans — EVERY single member district system is an AUTOMATIC MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER SYSTEM.
1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 GERRYMANDER DISTRICTS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL
— SINCE 1200S IN THE ENGLISH HOUSE OF COMMONS
— INFECTING BRIT COLONIES IN 1600S
— INFECTING STATES IN 1776
— INFECTING USA REGIME IN 1788.
SCOTUS HACKS TOO EVIL MORON STUPID TO DETECT THE MATH.
PR and AppV
The 1964 SCOTUS gerrymander cases raised the CONTROL percent from very roughly 5-15 percent in many States to about 30 percent in most States
— connected to the many city riots in the 1960s – and now econ DYING/DEAD older ghetto cities.
The top 2 primary States are now all close to 25 percent CONTROL.
REAL minority rule is about 10-15 percent due to gangster primaries
— a primary robot party HACK later gets elected in each rigged gerrymander district.
—
NO primaries.
PR and AppV — pending Condorcet
What is the citation for the case you referenced?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesberry_v._Sanders
Hey Dumo Rep, it doesn’t matter how many times you post on a thread. Everyone just ignores your garbage now.
DJ — typical Trump MORON comment.
NY election stats switched from horizontal mess to vertical mess —
multiple missing totals.
NY also shows gerrymander district BVS stats – blank-void-scattering (WI).
Folks with some sorting skills should do minority rule gerrymander math in own State for State legislature and USA Reps — above CA examples.
@DR,
Void votes are generally overvotes, though they might include ballots that have identifying marks.
Under New York con-fusion laws, voting for a candidate running on two different lines is not an overvote, but voting for two different candidates is. On con-fusing ballots, some offices are wrapped on to two rows. A voter fill in a bubble next to a picture a donkey or elephant on one row, and then go on to the 2nd row.
They would see no donkey or elephant. There would be no office title. They would be con-fused. But then they would notice that there were two candidates from the Frozen Zombie and Eclectic Alligator parties that would not not fit on the first row. They pick one, and thereby cast an overvote.
In 2010, New York had two Senate races, one the regular election; and another to fill a vacancy because the previous senator had quit in order to take another job. For one race, all the candidates fit on one row, and the other it took two rows. There were many more overvotes on that one.
It is a federal requirement that you be warned that you are about to cast an overvote and be given an opportunity to correct this. The explanation in New York left voters befuddled and con-fused, because it was mainly given to voters who would make a choice between the Frozen Zombie and Eclectic Alligator parties for a mystery office. Not the sharpest crayons in the box.
Since then, the message has been made simple. “You filled in to many bubbles. Your vote won’t count.” Much simpler than trying to explain why some bubbles are more equal than others.
JR —
perhaps some void brained voter morons love filling in ovals/boxes for entertainment ???
Any differences with ballot squares, ovals or circles ??? —
will matter with more number voting
— with numbers in/next to such squares, ovals or circles.