On February 6, the Hawaii House Judiciary Committee passed HB 712. It says no presidential candidate may be listed on the November ballot unless he or she has release income tax returns. It also says no presidential elector may vote for anyone in the electoral college if that presidential candidate has not released his or her tax returns.
This is good stuff… really good stuff. Probably unconstitutional but really good stuff! How about no one can be on the ballot if they are not white male? Hmmm…
How about only if the Prez candidate is a RED DONKEY COMMUNIST ???
GEE — WHY ARE OFFICE QUALIFICATIONS AND OFFICE TERMS IN CONSTITUTIONS ???
CON LAW 001 – DIRECT = INDIRECT
When we elect our 538-member PPR Electoral College in 2020, will have a team of 538 prioritized names with plenty of consecutively ranked names as back-ups to #1 and #2.
It’s not so much as any one person, but the whole team of equals, each with one unit of voting power.
The difference between our team and the one we propose to replace is that we can bring the team as never been there before.
The first steps on the beach having taken more than twenty-four consecutive years in the analogy of D-Day, 24 years is like 24 minutes, and Berlin is more than 150,000 years in the future.
That doesn’t mean we cannot go faster but the generals need left, right and center to hit the beach before daylight.
Some are already behind the front lines but everyone is waiting for all feet on shore.
Go Ogle [One] 2020
http://www.usparliament.org/google2020.php
HB 712 would also apply to candisates for vice president, governot, lieutenant governor, and mayor (in Hawaii a mayor is the chief executive of a county – Hawaii does not have incorporated cities).
Would the electoral votes cast by a Hawaii elector for Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren been valid?
The preamble to the bill has a snarky comment about a presidential candidate who demanded that the State of Hawaii Hawaii produce a birth certificate to verify the eligility of a former President.
14-1 kids physically born in the USA having foreign nation-state fathers are NOT USA citizens subject to the jurisdiction of the USA.
Too many SCOTUS HACK morons to count about nation-state 000001 stuff.
—
Obama’s father was a Brit citizen/subject the second Obama was born in 1961 —
mere 8 years having an illegal USA Prez.
I just wanted to post the actual text of the Fourteenth Amendment. I don’t want anyone to get bad information from the last comment.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
— means something = political ALLEGIANCE.
A-L-L FOREIGN FOLKS IN USA = NOOOOO such political ALLEGIANCE to USA.
Even took 1924 and 1940 USA laws to naturalize surviving USA American Indian tribes to become USA Citizens — after 1607-1890 American Indian genocides
—
The 1866 Senate added the first sentence in 14-1 after a genius noted the 1857 Dred Scott op was still in force [blacks could NOT be USA Citizens].
See also USA 1866 Civil Rights Act.
MAJOR paperwork/history update now needed to determine political nation-state status of ALL persons in USA areas.
IE political ALLEGIANCE going back to 4 July 1776
— earlier in some States – 19 Apr 1775 in Mass. – Day 1 of the 1775-1784 American Revolutionary War.
See last para of 4 July 1776 DOI.
ALL sorts of ALLEGIANCE test oaths in 1775-1784 in the States — MANY purges, expulsions, treason trials, etc. of Brits. — *loyalist* subjects of the TYRANT Brit King George III
–a kin to the loyalist Germans under Hitler and Japanese under Hirohito in WW II.
State naturalizations in 1775-1789 – esp. with armistice in 1782-1784 and peace in 1784-1789.
USA regime *uniform* naturalization law in 1790 onward.
IE – What was the nation-state / allegiance status of ALL your birth-chain fathers back to 4 July 1776 or earlier ???
Highly likely need for a USA general naturalization law ex post facto — due to missing/NON paperwork regarding political status of fathers in birth records for large percent of current persons.
One more highly likely giant fight in Devil City.
natural born citizen = ALLEGIANCE AT birth to a nation-state regime.
naturalized citizen = ALLEGIANCE change AFTER birth to another nation-state regime.
Due to the 2 world wars *subjects* become politically incorrect
— basically now only citizens in the circa 225 nation-state regimes — some small islands.
See various USA laws/treaties after USA got added areas — many foreign residents given option to become naturalized USA citizens or remain foreign folks residing in USA.
Need major data in computers to sort who’s who.
He is posting a bunch of nonsense. He is either disgenuine. Or doesn’t understand what he is writing. Possibly both.
Too many clueless *lawyers* on this list to count —
esp those who NEVER looked at the 39th Congress debates in 1865-1866
— dealing esp with 1857 Dred Scott, the 1865-1866 Black codes in many States [keeping ex-slaves having NO or very few civil rights and NO political rights).
IE for NON-lawyers — the ENTIRE legal establishment in the USA is ROTTED to its evil statist core
— students being brainwashed at many statist law skooools to be politically correct
— esp. having to get statist law *licenses* from govt HACKS.
Later lawyer elites from politically correct law skoools getting appointed by HACK USA Prezs and HACK USA Senators to be Fed HACK judges for life.
Comparable State/Local hack appointed judges in many States.
It all shows esp in the many JUNK court ops in election law cases
— keeping the HACK Donkeys/Elephants in POWER — in CONTROL.
—
PR and AppV