Tom Steyer Favors Creating a National Referendum Process

Tom Steyer, who announced a few days ago that he is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, says in this campaign you tube that he favors creating a “national referendum” process so that voters could determine federal laws.

Generally, a referendum refers to forcing a popular vote on a newly-passed law. One wonders if Steyer meant to also advocate for a national initiative process. Congress does so little these days, it isn’t likely that a national referendum, even if it existed, would be much of a vehicle for change.

A federal referendum process, or a federal initiative process, would require a U.S. Constitutional amendment. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.


Comments

Tom Steyer Favors Creating a National Referendum Process — 16 Comments

  1. Uniform definition of Elector-Voter in ALL of the USA —
    USA Citizen, 18 + yrs olde.

    PR and AppV and TOTSOP — in ALL govts in the USA.

    —–
    Really difficult for math MORONS and gerrymander oligarchs and monarchs.

  2. One more RED Donkey COMMUNIST Victory — in the Census – Citizen question mess

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-census-citizenship-question_n_5d2780d1e4b0060b11e9631e

    Count illegal INVADERS in 14-2 Census = more RED Donkey communists to be USA Reps in 2023 onward

    Earlier RED COMMUNIST Victories –
    Russia 1917
    China 1949
    Cuba 1959

    See the END of the Western Roman Empire — due to many Invasions of BARBARIANS – 180 AD – 476 AD.

    Means ZERO to ALL the RED Donkey Communists in the USA – esp in Deceit City – in the gerrymander Congress.

  3. noun
    noun: referendum; plural noun: referenda; plural noun: referendums

    a general vote by the electorate on a single political question which has been referred to them for a direct decision.

    —-
    Populist Democracy reforms – circa 1900
    initiative – new laws / consts.
    referendum – on enacted new law
    recall – of hacks
    —-
    See — State lists

    http://www.iandrinstitute.org/


    PR and AppV and TOTSOP – NOW Life or Death

  4. direct democracy = mob rule

    Anyone who thinks that it is possible to enact a constitutional amendment with such a wide impact is seriously delusional. I had originally thought Tom Steyer wasn’t yet another crazy lib. Seems I was wrong.

  5. ONLY if there are HUGE safeguards to keep it from being corporately hijacked.

    This has happened for decades in the initiative process in California, for example.

    IIRC, voters there, a decade or so ago, faced two directly conflicting initiatives on auto insurance. One of the two had been financed by the car insurance lobby in California.

    Frankly, I think it’s highly unlikely such safeguards could be erected at the federal level.

    And, even if they were, it’s possible the current Citizens United SCOTUS would call those shields unconstitutional.

    ==

    Don, why don’t you call direct democracy = gang rape instead. I’ve seen the Randian doorknobs use that one before.

  6. NOW –

    2019-2020 USA GOVT MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER MATH, 7 MAY 2019

    GERRYMANDER LOWLITES MINI SUMMARY —
    A. 30.3 PERCENT OF THE VOTERS ELECTED 218 D USA REPS OF 435 TOTAL IN 2018.
    B. 19.2 PERCENT OF THE VOTERS ELECTED 50 R USA SENATORS OF 100 TOTAL IN 2014-2018.
    C. 25.7 PERCENT OF THE VOTERS ELECTED R PREZ TRUMP IN 2016.

    ALL 50 State legislatures [and many larger local regimes] are left/right smaller versions of the A. USA H Reps.
    — about 30 pct indirect minority rule [since 1964 SCOTUS cases]
    — BIT WORSE IN TOP 2 PRIMARY STATES
    — DUE TO MORE NON-VOTES IN DD/RR DISTRICTS.

    See the SCOTUS Rucho DISASTER OP – 6-27-2019

    ANTI-DEMOCRACY GERRYMANDER OLIGARCHS/MONARCHS WELL ENTRENCHED.
    —–
    PR and AppV and TOTSOP – NOW Life or Death

    HOW MANY ELECTION RELATED AMDTS IN USA 12-27 AMDTS ???

  7. C. 25.7 PERCENT OF THE VOTERS ELECTED R PREZ TRUMP IN 2016.

    270 of 538 ECV — 28 States and ME CD2

    — total
    306 of 538 ECV in 30 States and ME CD2

  8. If the federal government just devolved some of its powers back to the states, there would be no need of this. We have made a everything a federal case.

  9. “If the federal government just devolved some of its powers back to the states…”

    LOL

  10. WZ-

    SCOTUS subversion of gold and silver coins — via Civil WAR I paper money >>> nonstop inflation — political-economic destruction of lower and middle classes.

    SCOTUS perversion of inter-State commerce cl after Civil WAR I.

    SCOTUS perversion of general welfare cl since 1936.

    Result – almost DEAD States — pass-thru agents of Fed Aid $$$ to local govts.

    PR and AppV and TOTSOP – NOW Life or Death

  11. “If the federal government just devolved some of its powers back to the states…” -WALTER ZIOBRO

    Well, that’s not the way it works. The states created the national government not the other way around. If the states want their power back then they should just take it. They don’t, by the way.

  12. The RED communist gerrymander oligarchs in the States love having a RED communist USA regime – esp since 1929 and

    esp since 1993 and the 4 punk Prezs – Clinton, Bush II, Obama and Trump.


    Divide the USA – RED West Coast – BLUE Middle – RED East Coast — Invest in moving Vans, planes and trains.

    See which regimes can econ survive.

    PR and AppV and TOTSOP – NOW Life or Death

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.