Some proponents of a local city charter initiative in Tacoma, Washington, have filed a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, on whether the First Amendment protects initiatives from being removed from the ballot before the voters can vote. Of course, this only refers to initiatives that have enough valid signatures. Save Tacoma Water v Port of Tacoma, 18-1518. The Washington state courts had removed the initiative from the ballot on the grounds that, if passed, the initiative would have been unconstitutional.
The initiative concerned whether the city should be required to hold a popular vote before issuing permits for new industries to use an exceptionally large amount of water from the city water system. Here is the cert petition. The cert petition says there is a Circuit split on the issue. The cert petition says that it would be unthinkable for a court to tell a legislative body that it couldn’t vote on a proposed bill, just because the bill might later be held unconstitutional. By analogy, then, the petition says initiatives should be entitled to the same treatment.
Difference –
legis bills
inits – it takes some exec action for stuff to get on ballots.
—
Some throwback to 1860-1861 stuff ???
— a few popular State votes on secession in later ConFed States.
It has been a W-A-R activity to get candidates and esp ballot issues in ballots for many decades —
due to incumbent robot party HACKS —
legis gerrymander OLIGARCHY HACKS
exec election HACKS and
judic HACKS.
Govts of, by and for the HACKS —
Public be damned / tax slaves.
Again –
See the book –
Sources of Our Liberties ed by Richard L. Perry (Am Bar Assn, 1959)
derivation of 1789-1791 USA Bill of Rights.
Sorry – NO voter petitions for issues in 1789-1791.
Petition in 1 Amdt has to do with generalized petitions-
See 1765 Stamp Act Petition
1774 Petition – 1st Cont Congress
19 Apr 1775 – NO more useless petitions to Brits-
just shoot Brit Army/Navy stooges/hacks of Brit King George III and the top Brit oligarchs.
>>> 2 Amdt.