Ohio Initiative Proponents Ask for Rehearing En Banc in Schmitt v LaRose

On August 13, the proponents of a local initiative in Ohio asked for a rehearing en banc in Schmitt v LaRose, 19-3196. This is the case the challenged the ability of local election board members to decide that an initiative should be kept off the ballot, even if it has enough valid signatures, because the board members think the initiative would not be constitutional or valid. Here is the Petition. The Sixth Circuit original decision in this case had virtually said the First Amendment doesn’t apply to the initiative process, a conclusion that is soundly rebutted in the brief.


Comments

Ohio Initiative Proponents Ask for Rehearing En Banc in Schmitt v LaRose — 1 Comment

  1. Are ALL the USA Courts of Appeal now TOTALLY filled with ANTI-Democracy robot party HACKS ???

    1st Amdt applies to States via 14 Amdt, Sec. 1.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.