If the proposal of the New York Campaign Finance Commission had been in effect in 2018, the only ballot-qualified parties would have been Democratic, Republican, and Conservative.
In that case, there are twelve legislative elections from 2018 that actually had a choice of candidates, but would have been one-candidate elections with the proposal in place. For the State Senate, they would have been these districts: 13, 16, 20, and 62. For Assembly, they would have been: districts 39, 40, 61, 62, 63, 76, 114, and 139.
NOOOO chance for minorities in 85 plus pct of rigged gerrymander districts.
—
PR and AppV and TOTSOP
Im going to go out on a limb here; The intention may be to limit voter choice.
SD-13 and SD-20 were rematches of quite competitive Democratic primaries where IDC incumbents were defeated, and then ran as Independence in the general and were handily beaten. They might have won under Top 2 where they could appeal to all voters.
Incidentally, you missed SD-17.
Most of the AD were really lopsided. 80:20 would be a nailbiter relatively speaking. The Libertarian candidate in AD-139 was a petition candidate.