On December 17, the Minnesota Supreme Court expedited the lawsuit De La Fuente v Simon, A19-1994. This is Rocky De La Fuente’s challenge to the Minnesota presidential primary ballot access law, which says that no candidate can get on a presidential primary unless that party approves of the person.
The Court ordered the Secretary of State to respond by December 31. If the Republican Party, or perhaps the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, wishes to express anything, they are invited to submit amicus briefs, also by December 31. The oral argument will be January 9, 2020, at 10 a.m.
The Minnesota Supreme Court has an excellent record on ballot access. In 2004 it unanimously invalidated a law that kept qualified parties from having any nominees on the general election ballot unless they had a high turnout in their primary. Also in 2004 it unanimously put a candidate for congress on the primary ballot, even though he was a fugitive living in Italy. But he met the constitutional qualifications to be a member of Congress, so because he had paid his filing fee, he could not be kept off the ballot.
I wonder what part of the State Constitution the MN Supreme Court uses.
What are De La Fuente’s long term political goals other than improving ballot access?
IF De La Fuente gets EQUAL ballot access he will have done more than armies of USELESS lawyers and judges since 1968 Williams v Rhodes.
It’s the same situation with many states across the land, such as CPMO, AKAIP, etc. Petty party bosses abusing their ‘power’ daily. We need radical election reform as an antidote to impending revolution.
Earlier BAN — 27 Nov 2019
https://ballot-access.org/2019/11/27/rocky-de-la-fuente-sues-minnesota-over-presidential-primary-ballot-access/
has link to Complaint
very shocking that ANY State SCT [esp] has some speed with ballot access cases.
Minnesota should eliminate partisan nominations and state-sponsored primaries.