Massachusetts, like 47 other states, elects its presidential electors on a winner-take-all system, in which the slate that gets the highest popular vote wins all of the state’s electors. On March 31, the First Circuit said that provision does not violate the U.S. Constitution. Here is the opinion in Lyman v Baker, 18-2235.
A similar case had the same outcome in Texas earlier this year. Other similar cases are pending in Appellate courts in California and South Carolina. Thanks to Howard Bashman for this news.
1/2 or less votes x gerrymander areas having 1/2 ECV + 1 = 1/4 or less elect each Prez — since 1832.
It shows — too many UN-declared foreign WARS to count — genocide of American Indian tribes, etc. – Civil WAR I (est 750,000 DEAD], etc.
Too many SOP violations to count.
—-
Uniform definition of Elector-Voter in ALL of USA
— USA citizen, 18 plus years olde on election days, be registered by 28 days before election days.
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
Have you ever considered creating an e-book or guest authoring on other blogs?
I have a blog based upon on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have you share
some stories/information. I know my audience would appreciate your work.
If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.