Michigan Files Brief in Defense of Current Primary Ballot Access Requirements

On April 10, Michigan filed this brief in Esshaki v Whitman, e.d., 2:20cv-10831.  This is the case in which a Republican U.S. House candidate is attacking the requirement that he submit 1,000 valid signatures to get on the primary ballot, by April 21.

The state barely acknowledges the health crisis.  It says the burden on him is not severe.  It says he should have gathered his signatures before the health crisis broke out.  It says he is always free to be a write-in candidate in the primary.  It says the state must guard against ballot-crowding and frivolous candidates.

The state says already 24 primary candidates for U.S. House have managed to file petitions.  It does not say that Michigan has 14 U.S. House seats, so that is only about one and two-thirds candidates from both major parties together, in the typical district.

The state’s brief doesn’t mention other states that have either reduced the number of signatures this year, or abolished petitions entirely, or extended petition deadlines.  The primary is August 4.

The oral argument will be April 15, Wednesday, at 2 p.m.


Comments

Michigan Files Brief in Defense of Current Primary Ballot Access Requirements — 5 Comments

  1. Mr. E. is trying to oppose Donkey Slotkin- one of the Pelosi New Age robots – who barely won in 2018.

    Thus another RNC v DNC type SCOTUS case.

  2. The R candidate EE is up against the Gang of 3 female top Mich Donkeys — GUV, SOS, AG — for a marginal USA Rep seat.

    — thus expect more SCOTUS action shortly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.