On April 16, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral arguments in Goldstein v Galvin, SJ-2020-150, the case in which some primary candidates ask for easier methods to get on the September 1 primary ballot.

Here is an article describing the hearing.  The Secretary of State supports easing the requirements for congress by 50%, but he does not favor easing the requirements for legislature.  He supports moving the deadline for state office petitions from April 28 to May 5 (the congressional primary petitions are due May 5).

The plaintiffs favor a cut for all petitions to one-third of the existing requirement, and a later deadline, and use of electronic signatures.

The Court is aware that a proposal similar to the Secretary of State’s recommendations passed the State Senate on April 16, and they expressed a wish that the House would pass it quickly, but there is no guarantee, and there is very little time.  The bill is S2632.  All it does is cut the number of signatures for U.S. Senate from 10,000 to 5,000; the number of signatures for U.S. House from 2,000 to 1,000; and the number of signatures for Governor’s Council from 1,000 signatures to 500 signatures.  It only applies to 2020, not future years.