U.S. Supreme Court Won’t Hear Last Remaining Case Over 2020 Vote-Counting

On April 19, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order in Bognet v Degraffenreid, 20-740. The case had been filed by a Republican candidate for Congress in 2020, arguing that the U.S. Constitution does not permit state courts to alter rules for federal elections. The lower federal courts had denied the candidate any relief. The U.S. Supreme Court vacated the lower court decisions and said the case is moot.

The case had been filed in the U.S. Supreme Court on November 20, 2020.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Won’t Hear Last Remaining Case Over 2020 Vote-Counting — 4 Comments

  1. The U S Constitution provisionally delegates regulation of elections to state legislatures until the Congress itself decides at any time to make or alter such regulations (Article I, Section 4). There is no mention of state courts having jurisdiction in federal elections.
    The Justices of the Supreme Court may be undertaken a paradigm shift in adjudicating elections laws. We await the case that reveals what they have in mind. Perhaps the Ninth Amendment becomes controlling in resolving elections and voter rights.

  2. Subversion of USC Title 2 –

    the day the election.

    Absentee ballots are ONLY a substitute for voting on election days in person by PM deadline.

    SCOTUS party HACKS at work.

    NOOO surprise about commie USA bill HR 1 trying for total takeover of elections – Fed/States/locals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.