Eighth Circuit Upholds Wording on Minnesota Independent Candidate Petitions

On September 3, the Eighth Circuit upheld the Minnesota law that requires noon-presidential independent candidate petitions to carry this language: “I solemnly swear (or affirm)…that I do not intend to vote at the primary election for the office for which this nominating petition is made.” The decision is only five pages, is unsigned, and will not be published. The decision simply declares that the plaintiffs had abandoned their challenge to this wording at the oral argument. There is no mention of any state interest in requiring this wording on the petition.

Here is the decision in Libertarian Party of Minnesota v Simon, 20-2244.

The decision also upholds some other characteristics of the law. The Libertarians had argued that the whole petition process is discriminatory because whereas voting is secret, petition signatures are not. The party had also argued that the process is discriminatory because voters can cast postal ballots, whereas petitions must be circulated in person. But the court said that Minnesota allows anyone to download a blank petition form, sign it, and mail it in. The three judges on the case are Raymond Gruender, Morris Arnold, and David Stras.


Comments

Eighth Circuit Upholds Wording on Minnesota Independent Candidate Petitions — 2 Comments

  1. Yet another reason to allow filing fees to be accepted in place of nomination petitions. With that option, no one need be deprived of voting in any primary.

  2. ATTACK ALL gerrymander regimes —

    1/2 or less votes x 1/2 rigged dists = 1/4 or less CONTROL = oligarchy –

    subversion of 4-4 RFG and 14-1 EPCL


    NO primaries.

    Equal secret nom pets.

    PR
    APPV
    TOTSOP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.