On August 24, the Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in Leibsohn v Hobbs, cv-22-0204. The issue was whether a statewide initiative should be removed from the ballot because some of the circulators’ paperwork was incomplete. The Court agreed with the lower courts that the paperwork problems should not result in removing the initiative from the ballot.

On the same day, the court issued a somewhat similiar opinion in Protect Our Arizona v Hobbs, cv-22-0203.

A third opinion, also issued on August 24, says that in some cases, the circulators’ failure to provide the unit number as part of the address might result in their work being disqualified. Mussi v Hobbs, cv-22-0207.