Minnesota House Passes National Popular Vote Plan Bill

On April 18, the Minnesota House passed the National Popular Vote Plan bill. It is inside the huge bill that has almost 200 pages of legislative changes, HF 1830. All Democrats voted “yes” and all Republicans voted “no”.


Comments

Minnesota House Passes National Popular Vote Plan Bill — 64 Comments

  1. Why are there so many commies up there? Trump almost won Minnesota, but the dim politicians seem to have only got worse.

  2. The principle that the candidate who receives the most votes in the final round should be declared the winner is the essence of enlightenment-era thinking, and has nothing in common with communism.

    Some day, if nothing is done, the Republican nominee for president might get the most popular votes and yet the Democratic nominee would win a majority in the electoral college. See the December 1, 2022 print issue of Ballot Access News, front page story. In the 2022 election (which was not a presidential election) the Republican Party got 54,214,821 votes and the Democratic Party got 52,689,067 votes, if one uses the office at the top of the ticket as a stand-in for a presidential election (Governor is deemed to be at the top). Yet the Democrat won in states with a majority of the electoral vote. It could happen for real in 2024.

  3. The National Popular Vote Plan does not solve the basic issue of plurality voting. You can STILL get a minority President. Look at the returns from 1992 and 1996.

  4. Richard Winger want large commie cities to declare the winners because it follow his views. Screw small states like Wyoming.

  5. I predict that id the NPV plan, or any popular vote amendment for President ever becomes law, that BOTH major parties will secretly encourage the running of third party and independent candidates for President for the covert purpose of drawing votes away from their opponents.

  6. Look where Richard Winger lives. San Francisco. Rampant crime, frequent theft because there’s no consequences, defecating on the sidewalks, needles everywhere, tent cities, and now paying black people for something over 150 years ago- in a free state.

    That is why he supports NPV and communism.

  7. NPV SCHEME –

    ATTEMPT TO SUBVERT USA CONST — ESP 14-1 AMDT EP CL —-

    HAVING VOTES OUTSIDE A STATE DETERMINE RESULTS INSIDE A STATE.
    —-
    PR
    APPV
    TOTSOP

  8. EC IS 1 OF THE 3 ANTI-DEMOCRACY MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER SYSTEMS IN THE USA REGIME.

    1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 GERRYMANDER AREAS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL

    SUPER-WORSE PRIMARY EXTREMIST MATH

    THUS BAADE TO WORST MINORITY RULE —
    USA H REPS
    USA PREZ/VP EC – MIX OF REPS AND SENATE ROT MATH
    USA SENATE

    MAIN MEDIA = TOTAL MATH BRAIN DEAD ABOUT THE EVIL REAL NATURE OF THE CURRENT USA REGIME.

  9. Wrong. They voted for Nixon in 1972. So its actually since 1976. But they did almost go for Trump. Trump probably won the eligible vote.

  10. Reagan was the best president after Coolidge until TRUMP came along and Trumped them all.

  11. At the very least, any national popular vote scheme should require a clear majority of votes to determine the outcome. But the current NPV that is currently being circulated does not require that. In fact, most proposals require only a 40% plurality to take effect. This takes a bad idea, and makes it horrible.

    JUST STOP AND THINK WHAT THIS WOULD DO:

    It makes it advantageous to BOTH political parties to encourage the candidacy of third party and independent candidates for President in order to bring the vote total of your opponent down below 50%.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’m NOT opposed to third party candidates for President. I usually vote for them myself. But, this proposal has a dysfunctional effect on third parties: the Democrats in blue states will only challenged the candidates of leftist third parties, while the Republicans in red states will only challenge the candidacies of rightist third parties, leaving voters with limited third party alternatives.

    The effect of this may be negligible in any one state, but, you must remember that under NPV, ALL the votes from EVERYWHERE impact the outcome. Consequently, the chances are that, in a close election, NO candidate ever gets 50%.
    In today’s highly partisan political environment, this could be catastrophic. It’s conceivable that partisans on BOTH side might reject the outcome, challenge the votes from EVERYWHERE. Remember what I just said above, ALL the votes from EVERYWHERE impact the outcome. It would be total chaos.

  12. It’s an unconstitutional interstate compact without congressional approval, and recounts would be a total national nightmare.

  13. “recounts would be a total national nightmare.”

    With that, I totally agree.

  14. WHAT NATION HAS THE LARGEST ELECTION FOR A NATIONAL EXECUTIVE (ESP NON-PARTISAN) AND MANAGES TO SURVIVE ???

  15. Chinese elections are a bad joke. I’d have to look up whether they have direct election of an executive even as a formality. India is about to surpass China in population. I think they have a parliamentary system, but again I would need to do some brushing up. The US is third on the population list, so you know the deal there. India has a large illiterate vote. I’m not sure you would want to emulate the elections of e.g. Nigeria, Pakistan, or Indonesia either. Brazil has presidential elections, and they have been rather contentious. Define survive?

  16. Russia has excellent presidential elections, entirely unmarred by controversy in recent years.

  17. WHY DOES ANDY Z FROM ARIZONA WANT A THURD WORLD ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN GOD’S OWN HOMELAND??? IS IT BECAUSE HE HATES OUR LEGITIMATELY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP AND WANTS XI CCP TYRANNY WITH DEMENTIA XOE XIDEN HAND PUPPET AND ANOTHER STOLEN ELECTION LIKE 2020 IN 2024???

  18. ALSO EACH STATE IS A SOVEREIGN NATION STATE SO UNLESS AZ FATHER DADDY WAS FROM MN HE SHOULD HAVE NO SAY IN MN ELECTIONS OR ELECTORS!!!!!

  19. There needs to be a deal made: Popular vote plan for President in exchange for proportional representation in other elections.

  20. CA AND TX BARELY SURVIVING WITH STATEWIDE ELECTIONS OF GOVS ???

    HOW MANY BAN TROLL MORONS LOVE ANTI-DEMOCRACY MONARCH/OLIGARCH REGMES ???

    IT SHOWS IN THEIR MANY JUNK/WORSE POSTS.

    ANY BAN TYPE WEBSITES IN RUSSIA, RED CHINA, N. KOREA, ETC. FOR USA TROLL MORONS TO POST THEIR JUNK —

    THEN BE QUICKLY ARRESTED AND PURGED ???

  21. California and Texas are sovereign nation states. The United States is supposed to be a coalition of nations similar to the European Union, Organization of African Unity, etc.

  22. Democracy is another way of saying communism. There are important differences between a democracy and a republican system.

  23. AZ many junk / worse posts should be left up because even special needs cranks like him should have freedom of speech. Whenever az points his shaky skeletal finger and calls people names 4 point back at him, give or take a couple.

  24. It’s idiotic to compare a thriving free federal republic like Russia with third world dumps like China and North Korea. A number of us here are Russian citizens living in Russia, who lived in the US in the past, perhaps as in my case for university and business reasons, as well as visits / vacations. I’m proud of my Russian motherland and our commander in chief, and of the special operation to demilitarize the Ukrainian Nazi Satanists.

    I participate in other fora in Russia and some Russian language fora outside Russia, as well as English language fora based in countries such as the US and UK. Contrary to AZ fantasies, no one has arrested or purged myself or anyone I know of, including at times when we have been very critical of our government. I was a member of an opposition party, LDPR, until recent events. The passing of our former party leader, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the elevation of Leonid Slutsky, and the excellent job our President has been doing have convinced me to switch my support to United Russia Party in the past year.

  25. The California gubernatorial election was stolen from Larry Elder by racist liberal’s.

  26. Democracy is not Communism. It’s leads and opens the door to it. Read your history books.

  27. Read your history books about what your American founding father’s said about democracy. And it certainly didn’t help us in Russia.

  28. FOR NON TROLL MORONS —

    DEMOCRACY = MAJORITY RULE

    MONARCHY/OLIGARCHY = MINORITY RULE
    —-
    JUNK TEACHING OF CIVICS/GOVTS IN PUBLIK SKOOOLS SINCE EARLY 1800S.

  29. Two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner is majority rule. I didn’t attend American schools before universally, which itself was private, thankfully. Such simple matters, which were in no doubt at all in your country during the 1800s, do not have to be explained, even to normally intelligent children.

  30. CURRENT MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER ROT IN THE USA —

    1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED GERRYMANDER AREAS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL

    = MINORITY RULE WOLVES – LIVING OFF THE ***NET*** TAX SLAVE SHEEP.

    SUPER-WORSE EXTREMIST PRIMARY MATH.

    PR
    APPV
    TOTSOP

    HOW MANY BAN TROLL MORONS ARE AGENTS OF / ACTUAL MINORITY RULE WOLVES ???

  31. NPV gives all of the power to the cities, who typically vote communist. Hence, NPV enables communism.

  32. True. And AZ seems to have switched from opposing to supporting it midstream, or did I misunderstand what he wrote above?

  33. Big cities have 20% of the population. Suburbs have 40% of the population, and rural areas and small cities together have 40% of the population.

  34. Richard is acting like suburbs are 100% Republican which is totally false. There are numerous suburbs that are 60%, 80% or more commie.

    Richard supports NPV because he wants commies in office. He has never once criticized Biden or his handlers. He’s ripped Trump numerous times.

  35. 90% of 20% plus x% of 40% = 50% +1?

    Don’t ask me, I can’t do math that complicated, especially with legs midair.

  36. So, you’re saying it’s possible to, have a president or better yet presidentess, who, gets single digits in rural areas??? I love screwing the rural hayseeds!!!

  37. Yes, you and me both. I’m looking forward to taking all of their guns from their cold dead fingers and recycling their bibles to help save the environment.

  38. Oh honey I know exactly what you mean. I get one digit if I’m lucky down near the Florida Georgia Line.

  39. And for those of you who lack even the attention span to scroll up the added or summary is to

    https://ballot-access.org/2023/04/20/florida-bill-requiring-initiatives-to-pass-with-66-67-of-vote-advances/#comment-1152740

    Oh, who do I kid? As if you will follow a link, much less two, much less read, comprehend, and retain what you learn. I forget which country is my primary audience here sometimes. Whenever I think I dumbed it down enough, I’m wrong. To understand the difference between our country’s and cultures see the different between how President Putin speaks (in translation if you must) and how your president speaks. I’ll need to study the Trump method of rhetoric to American audiences, bearing in mind just how well educated, intelligent, and perceptive President TRUMP actually is.

  40. Maxim, you keep sinking unfathomably lower and lower. Why continue the pretense? Dumbing down?

    You are a self professed die hard follower of Vladimir Wolfowitz “Zhirinovsky” Edelshtein, who’s father as it turns out moved to Israel and became a politician there, only whereupon young Edelstein became a Zhirinovsky only through his disgraced mother meeting a man with whom he shares no blood! Did ldpr under Slutsky lose your vote only because his mum didn’t change his family name to something more Slavic?

    This is the perfect complement to your worshipping Jew rabbi Jesus Christ. Perhaps time for you to wear the yarmulke in public, maybe move to Israel and join IDF? How many other closets do you plan to come of next — gay? Pedo? Dopehead? Red? Pinko? Satanist, maybe? For shame!! If this wasn’t so all sad it might be actually, unintentionally on your part, funny.

  41. Finally MAX, did you switch to United Russia Party due to. Or in spite of President Putin? Did you have to cajole yourself to force the party switch, that after all the commander in chief’s partner in the tandem is Dmitry Mendel, not so different after all than LDPR’s Slutsky or Edelstein, so your fine either way?!?!

  42. MADAM, Assuming zero rural votes and 90% of the big city votes, using Mr. Winger’s 20/40/20 distribution requires a hair over 45% of the suburban and small city votes. In reality there would not be zero rural votes, so the big city numbers can be adjusted down accordingly.

    Nevertheless it’s quite possible to win under NPV while carrying a strong majority of big city votes, a competitive loss in suburban and small city areas, and negligible scattered rural votes. This is probably what would happen, as it’s easiest for Democrats to concentrate their t.v. and radio campaigns, in person candidate appearances, mail drops, door knocking, vote harvesting, etc primarily in the big cities and secondarily in their suburbs and some smaller cities. Rural areas could be safely ignored, and they would not need anywhere near saturation or even dominance in the suburbs as long as they stay dominant in big cities.

  43. Sorry, that would be actually 55% of the burbs. Let’s say 80% of big city votes and 20% of rural. Still sounds quite doable.

  44. Your math is still off. At 80% of 20% (16%) and 20% of 40% (8%) your still need 26% of the total to not lose, or 65% of the remainder.

  45. Just imagine how frustrated I have to be to solve that.

  46. You say that like it’s a bad thing? Maybe ballot boxes actually LIKE getting stuffed to capacity and get stretched out? Have you ever thought about it from the perspective of the box ? I bet not! Think of the poor ballot boxes, all empty, just waiting and waiting for what seems like forever to get stuffed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.