Law Professor Michael Dimino of Widener University has filed an interesting amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court, in Mazo v Way, 22-1033. This is the case over New Jersey’s law that permits some words on primary ballots but not others. Professor Dimino has original ideas about the method that courts have been using to adjudicate election law cases over the last 40 years. Read the second half if his amicus here.