Three More Amicus Curiae Briefs Filed in U.S. Supreme Court in New Jersey Ballot Labels Case

Three more amicus curiae briefs have been filed in Mazo v Way, 22-1033, the case over New Jersey’s ballot labels for primary candidates. All three are on the side of the candidates, who are fighting to strike down the law that restricts the words they can use.

Here is the brief of the Good Government Coalition of New Jersey and RepresentUS.

Here is the brief of Law Professor Derek Muller, an expert on election law.

Here is the brief of the Liberty Justice Center and the Manhattan Institute.


Comments

Three More Amicus Curiae Briefs Filed in U.S. Supreme Court in New Jersey Ballot Labels Case — 12 Comments

  1. JUST LIKE THE SONG GOES: YO! I WANT TO TAKE YOU TO A GAY BAR I WANT TO TAKE YOU TO A GAY BAR, GAY BAR, GAY BAR. LET US START A WAR, START A NUCLEAR WAR AT THE GAY BAR, GAY BAR….

  2. 12:11 PM ONE MORE FELONY FRAUD POST BY THE BAN RESIDENT PRE-SKOOL TROLL MORON / IMPERSONATOR.

    WHEN WILL THE TMI GET A 4 AM FBI VISIT ???

  3. The 32nd of never. FBI has bigger fish to fry than preschool ban troll morons impersonating each other or each other’s two letter registered trademarks.

  4. Don’t get me wrong, I find the AZ impersonator or 2nd AZ to be the only thing dumber than the first/original AZ.

  5. Clearly, the dominant partisans in a state consider the ballot their own property to regulate in their own interest. All ballot access laws that censor the right of the voter to choose candidates should be struck down as unconstitutional. The open all write-in ballot restores the rights voters exercised before the 1890s secret ballot reform in which the states confiscated the right to print ballots into a state monopoly which could be censored to entrench incumbent political partisans in power.
    A “republican form of government” as required in the Constitution cannot exist when voters are compelled to use a ballot which shackles them to candidate names provided by partisan state authorities. Abolish all candidates fees and petition quotes. No printing of names on the ballot. Let voters choose unencumbered by ballot censorship.

  6. Agreed with Frank Robinson – No fees, no petitions, no printing of names on ballot.

    How about no ballot? Standing count of voters?

  7. Secret votes are a bad idea. Voting is political power. Power without accountability is dangerous.

  8. VOTE WRONG IN PUBLIC AND GET KILLED / MERELY ENSLAVED IS A BETTER *IDEA* ???

    SEE OLDE IRAQ 1979 – ANTI-SADDAM FOLKS ARRESTED IN PUBLIC MEETING – NEVER SEEN AGAIN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.