This story concerns the pending request by the New York Libertarian Party and the New York Green Party to the U.S. Supreme Court, that the Court hear their ballot access case. The lawsuit challenges the restrictive changes made to the New York ballot access laws in 2020.
The Court probably won’t decide whether to hear the case or not until late September, or possibly even later than that.
SCOTUS 22-89
NOOOOO MENTION OF 1954 BROWN V BD OF ED IN LP NY CERT PET —
FULLY EXPECT ANOTHER DEFEAT- CERT DEN. ????
Honestly, I hope they win their case and get the justice they deserve.
CORRECTION –
22-893
https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-democrats-play-defense-keep-160000458.html
2024 MARGINAL USA SENATE RACES
USA SENATE – PERHAPS THE MOST ANTI-DEMOCRACY OLIGARCH LEGIS BODY IN WESTERN CIVILIZATION.
— BLOW-HARD EXTREMIST HACKS FROM THE MANY SMALL POP STATES
—
P-A-T
I agree with you, James.
@AZ,
Are single sex sports competition a violation of the separate is not equal principal?
JR
GOVT ORDERED single sex sports competitions ???
—-
With new age moron ops — likely YES.
Good luck to fems in contact sports – boxing, wrestling, etc.
How many classes of stuff in ALL regimes ??? A to Z
what is connection – 14 Amdt secs 1 and 5.
see olde USA 1866 civil rights Act, secs 1 and 2
A to Z? They’re all on the left side.
How many classes of ***PERSONS*** in ALL regimes in 1866 to 2023 ???
AGE
***
CITIZENSHIP
***
SEX
***
ZYGOTE
No idea, but A and Z are both bottom left.
Chances are that the federal courts will “punt” this case downfield. past next year’s election.
Of course they will. And Trump will be President then. They got nothing, and they know it. As usual, Trump holds all the cards.
Ralphie , he’s talking about the meshuggenehs in Jew York, not the phony cases against President Trump.
LOL OK. Nobody cares about that. Trump will finally be President again, and the second term will be much better than even the first. That’s the important thing. Keep your eyes on the ball.
Yo Qwerty,
I keeps a blue flag hanging out my backside
But only on the left side, yeah that’s the Crip side
Ain’t no other way to play the game I play
I cuts so much you thought I was a DJ
Hang on snoopy…snoopy hang on!
@AZ,
The SCOTUS in American Party of Texas ruled separate procedures did not violate equal protection.
JR—
SCOTUS– NON-STOP IGNORING 1954 BROWN V BD OF ED IN ELECTION CASES. —
BALLOT ACCESS SINCE 1968 AND
GERRYMANDERS SINCE 1964
—-
BRAIN DEAD SO-CALLED LAWYERS ALSO IGNORING B V BOE
—-
DID 1866 RR FOLKS IN CONGRESS TRY TO PROTECT WHITE RR FOLKS IN EX-SLAVE STATES ALONG WITH EX-BLACK SLAVES ???
OR – WERE WASTING LOTS OF TIME AND EFFORT IN GETTING THE 14 AMDT RATIFIED ???
Lawyers are not brain dead in rationally calculating what cases are likely to succeed. They’re being smart. Even in the unlikely case that AZ is smarter than everyone else, it wouldn’t do any good for lawyers to spend limited resources (time and money) only to lose. Which they would do if all the judges and justices are what AZ calls “brain dead, ” and that remains true in the unlikely case that he’s right about everything on the merits.
Brown v board was just some justices opinion as well. It could quite conceivably be overturned, much as Roe was. If you’re going to base your arguments off justices past opinions, you shouldn’t just cherrypick.
There’s a reason AZ cases lost back when he was bringing them, why they would continue to lose if anyone brought them now, why he’s no longer bringing them, and why no one else is either.
What’s an RR Folks?
HOW MANY LOSING BALLOT ACCESS CASES BY THOSE *rationally calculating* KNOW-IT-ALL LP SO-CALLED LAWYERS SINCE 1970 ???
RR = RIGHTWING REPUBLICAN PARTY FOLK.
Unlike you, they at least had some winning cases, so their batting average is better than yours (.000 as far as I know). In 1866 republicans were not necessarily “right wing.” Southern and Western democrats tended to be more right wing than Republicans then. If your question is whether left wing congressional Republicans in the 1860s did whatever they could to help carpetbaggers, the answer is yes. The federal government had some limitations back then. Also, they had limited control, particularly given separation of powers and other various issues and concerns.
@Pat,
I think Radical Republican is what AZ means by RR.
@AZ,
You claimed that lawyers had not brought equal protection cases based on Brown with regard to ballot access. That is not true. Your repeating it does not make it true.
You have failed to recognize that Brown only applies to public education where the Topeka Schools claimed they were providing equal schools.