U.S. District Court in California Suggests Voters Do Not Have Standing to Challenge Former President Donald Trump’s Ballot Access

On September 25, U.S. District Court Judge Lynn Sammartino, a Bush Jr. appointee, issued a Show Cause order in Schaefer v USA and Trump, s.d. California, 3:23cv-1451. Her order says that the plaintiff, Michael Schaefer, a California voter, probably doesn’t have standing to bring a challenge to former President Donald Trump’s ballot status in the California Republican presidential primary. The judge is permitting Schaefer to file a brief in defense of his own standing. It is not due until October 27. Here is the judicial order.


Comments

U.S. District Court in California Suggests Voters Do Not Have Standing to Challenge Former President Donald Trump’s Ballot Access — 4 Comments

  1. All these challenges are a ridiculous waste of time. Keep it up, libtards. The more BS you throw at Trump the more you drive up donations and turnout. Keep digging your own political graves.

  2. WHAT HAPPENS IF/WHEN VOTERS NOMINATE/ELECT AN *UN-QUALIFIED* PERSON ???

    OLDE *QUO WARRANTO* IS NOW A USA/STATE CIVIL ACTION IN MOST STATES.

    HOW BRAIN DEAD ARE SCOTUS HACKS ???

  3. VOTERS ELECT 12 AMDT PREZ ELECTORS IN ALL 50 STATES/DC.

    ABOLISH THE EC MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER ROT

    UNIFORM DEFINITION OF VOTER IN USA ELECTIONS —

    USA CITIZEN, 18 PLUS YRS OLDE, BE REGISTERED BY 28 DAYS BEFORE ELECTION DAYS — ALL PARTS OF USA- INCLUDING COLONIES.

    NO RIGGED PROPERTY / MENTAL/ CRIMINAL JUNK DISQUALIFICATION STUFF BY ANTI-DEMOCRACY MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS.

    P-A-T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.