Utah Special Congressional Election Results

Utah held a special election on November 21 to fill the vacancy in the Second District. The results: Republican 57.35%; Democratic 33.73%; Libertarian 2.66%; Constitution 2.17%; United Utah 1.79%; independent Perry Myers 1.42%; independent Joe Buchman .84%. See the full results here.

When this seat was last up, in November 2022, the percentages had been: Republican 59.71%; Democratic 34.01%; United Utah 3.32%; Constitution 2.96%.


Comments

Utah Special Congressional Election Results — 18 Comments

  1. That’s a very, very stupid idea. Name one other person who supports that scheme.

  2. Each legis body must be 100 pct full to deal with exec / judic / foreign / felon machinations.

    esp majority rule P.R. bodies


    see olde accidental prez tv series- most of USA govt killed at Capitol bldg explosion — esp most USA reps

  3. TV series is fiction. There’s no reason for legislatures to be 100% full all the time. Special elections work just fine. I see AZ can’t name one other person who supports his imbecilic “replacement lists,” an unworkable idea if I ever heard one.

  4. TOO MANY POLISCI / CONLAW MORONS TO COUNT.

    PROGRESS SINCE 1776-1789 IN MOST *SCIENCES* —-

    P.R. / NONPARTISAN REGIMES / APPROVAL VOTING / RCV VOTING / CONDORCET VOTING

  5. WHERE WAS THE 9II PLANE TAKEN DOWN IN W. PA BY ON BOARD HEROES GOING —

    TO WHITE HOUSE / CAPITOL BLDG ???

    HOW MANY NEW AGE DOMESTIC / FORN KILLERS WANT TO KILL ALL CONGRESS FOLKS —

    PUTIN / XI / NK / IRAN / HAMAS / ETC ETC ???

  6. Moron AZ still hasn’t shown any evidence that junk “Polisci” meets the textbook definition of science. There’s nothing actually scientific about “polisci,” which is complete quackery. His laundry list of alleged progress is completely composed of idiotic schemes to promote election fraud and make things worse.

    Troll retard AZ has nothing better than hysterical rhetorical question to promote his ridiculous candidate replacement list idea which exactly zero other people support. The poor imbecile ignores the fact that there is a real world in which his far fetched scenario has never occurred, and that most of what legislative bodies do at any level is useless busywork or actively harmful, so even if such a far fetched scenario ever occurred, it wouldn’t exactly be the end of the world.

    Comparing President Putin, a patriot and elected leader, to the others on his list is numbskull idiocy of the worst kind. Putin is the greatest savior of Christian European civilization in the world today, just as Trump is saving America. We must ensure a victory for Trump and a future for White children. You will not replace us, and Russia is our friend!

  7. TROLL MORONS LOVE KILLER ABSOLUTE MONARCHS AND HAVE TOTAL CONTEMPT FOR LAW MAKERS AND COURT JUDGES —

    IT SHOWS IN THEIR TROLL MORON POSTS.

    SEE TYRANT TRUMP AND HIS GANGSTER FELONS.

  8. Troll moron AZ once again admits he is a troll moron, as he regularly calls judges and lawmakers morons, thus fitting his self-definition of troll moron. Calling Trump a tyrant further cements the fact that he’s a moron.

    An intelligent poster might respond to the above, showing (if it were possible) that “polisci” is actual science, and/or that his unworkable candidate replacement scheme has any support whatsoever. Not so AZ; he responds as a troll moron would, because he is one, as you can see above.

  9. USSR today is fake news, and even troll moron AZ must realize the troll moron attempt at satire of legitimate questions asked and opinions held by patriotic Trump supporters who are seeking to save America is not actual “MAGA opinion.”

  10. Many quack sciences have all sorts of efforts to determine this, that, or the other thing. The problem is that they are based on faulty premises. Polisci is quack science because it can’t control for variables, which is a fundamental requirement of science.

    Even hard science has been unduly and heavily politicized in the service of normative agendas. Junk science like Polisci is far worse, essentially consisting of nothing else. When you explicitly contend that “Polisci” proves some normative narrative, as AZ does, rather than just being an inquiry method, that’s the last nail in its coffin. People who tell you to “follow the science” are doing the exact opposite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.