Comments

Column in The Atlantic on No Labels and Its Long-term Effect on Ballot Access — 10 Comments

  1. “Campaign-finance laws place limits on the size of the contributions an individual can give to a federal political campaign or party committee.”

    NO $ amount in Amendment 1.

    Thus, another reason to remove caps on individual contribution amounts.

  2. I CONCUR WITH JUSTICE W.Z. — WHO CAN ALSO DECIPHER THE 1 AMDT.

    WILL *DONATIONS* BE EVER BE DEEMED INCOME AND BE TAXED VIA THE 16TH AMDT ???

  3. No lube can lead to something good, but probably won’t. There is a low, but not vanishingly low, chance that this antiTrump scheme / desperation ploy by the derp state – fake news axis of evil will backfire and help Trump in exactly the way the demon rats fear. The only thing more likely is that it will just be a repeat of 2012 and end up with no ticket nomination.

    Trump will win by a landslide margin the demon rats can’t cheat out of this time with or without lube, but no lube could make their pain even more intense, and thus even more enjoyable. But, most likely won’t. Regardless, the sound of millions of demon rats screaming in pain as Trump wins a massive victory in another huge touchdown for Jesus will be the most wonderful music we ever heard, like a choir of angels and the TRUMPets of the Lord at the Second Coming.

  4. She might make a good veep. I think Trump Jr would still be the most inspired choice, but God will help Trump make the best decision for our country regardless of what it will be. With Trump and Jesus on our side, America can’t lose!

  5. I wonder if Elliot Ackerman is related to Peter Ackerman, who was one of the primary founders of Americans Elect, which is a forerunner to the No Labels Party.

  6. I thought all Ackermans are related, being members of the 14th Fugawi tribe of fake Hebrews.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.