Comments

News Story Explains Ballot Access for Candidates for President of Russia — 32 Comments

  1. Less than in the US. Meanwhile, the most recent election in Ukraine was suspended and even the mayor of Kiev calls Zelensky an autocrat.

  2. If electronic voting and multiple election days are signs of dishonest vote counting in Russia, what are they in the US?

    How is the US supporting democracy by supporting Ukraine against Russia, when Russia is going to have a presidential election and Ukraine cancelled theirs?

  4. Troll moron AZ keeps calling freely elected popular leaders like Trump and Putin tyrants, while not applying that label to actual tyrants like Biden who steal elections or Zelensky who cancelled his.

  5. White, if you think the 2020 election was stolen, which states were incorrectly called? Trump never says which states he thinks were decided incorrectly.

  6. Start with the closest dozen or states so called for Biden. Trump has said that if the vote count was honest, even California and New York would be for Trump. I think he’s right. But even if that’s not true, certainly any state which Biden supposedly won by less than 5% was stolen.

  7. No, name a state. Name any state that you have reason to believe had a dishonest vote count.

  8. Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, etc.
    No state had an honest count. Some states were more dishonest than others, and some were still shown as win by Trump despite the rampant cheating everywhere.

  9. HOW MANY STATES WITH TRUMP FELON FAKE 12 AMDT ELECTORS ??? —

    MANY NOW INDICTED / UNDER INVESTIGATION.

    WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE THAT —

    *** No state had an honest count. ***

    CIRCA 150,000,000 VOTES COUNTED.

    HOW MANY COURT CASES ABOUT THE 2020 PREZ VOTE COUNTS ???

    JUST MORE TRUMP HACK TROLL MORONS MAKING THEIR ROBOT PARTY HACK LINE JERK COMMENTS.

  10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election

    ABOUT HALFWAY DOWN PAGE—

    Close states
    States where the margin of victory was under 1% (37 electoral votes; all won by Biden):
    1. Georgia, 0.23% (11,779 votes) – 16 electoral votes
    2. Arizona, 0.31% (10,457 votes) – 11 electoral votes
    3. Wisconsin, 0.63% (20,682 votes) – 10 electoral votes (tipping-point state for Biden victory)[329]
    States where the margin of victory was between 1% and 5% (86 electoral votes; 42 won by Biden, 44 by Trump):
    1. Pennsylvania, 1.16% (80,555 votes) – 20 electoral votes (tipping-point state for Trump victory)[330]
    2. North Carolina, 1.35% (74,483 votes) – 15 electoral votes
    3. Nevada, 2.39% (33,596 votes) – 6 electoral votes
    4. Michigan, 2.78% (154,188 votes) – 16 electoral votes
    5. Florida, 3.36% (371,686 votes) – 29 electoral votes
    States/districts where the margin of victory was between 5% and 10% (80 electoral votes; 17 won by Biden, 63 by Trump):
    1. Texas, 5.58% (631,221 votes) – 38 electoral votes
    2. Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district, 6.50% (22,091 votes) – 1 electoral vote
    3. Minnesota, 7.11% (233,012 votes) – 10 electoral votes
    4. New Hampshire, 7.35% (59,267 votes) – 4 electoral votes
    5. Maine’s 2nd congressional district, 7.44% (27,996 votes) – 1 electoral vote
    6. Ohio, 8.03% (475,669 votes) – 18 electoral votes
    7. Iowa, 8.20% (138,611 votes) – 6 electoral votes
    8. Maine, 9.07% (74,335 votes) – 2 electoral votes
    Blue denotes states or congressional districts won by Democrat Joe Biden; red denotes those won by Republican Donald Trump.
    [NO COLORS IN BAN POSTS]

    NOTE ME/NE GERRYMANDER DISTS

  11. Interesting suggestion in the article that various jailed felons and expatriates would be serious contenders in the election if only they were in the country and not in a penal colony. The factual basis for this seems challenging. I remember reading, and possibly writing (I was an employee of the Soviet government, like everyone else) similar things about the US elections, I think around 1984.

  12. All of the political units mentioned in the article and comments are far too large. Nobody can effectively govern that many people.

  15. WHAT BAN TROLL MORON HAS THE MOST FAKE NAMES ???

    ONLY THE BAN PROGRAMMER AND NSA KNOW FOR SURE ???

  16. White Men, do you have any evidence for any particular state? There were 90-some lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters and campaign aleging vote fraud, and all of them lost. 80% of the county clerks of the U.S. are Republicans. The Republican-controlled Arizona legislature did a “forensic recount” which confirmed the results. The Secretary of State of Georgia is and was a Republican. Something doesn’t become true just because you want it to be true. To know truth, evidence must be gathered. It was gathered and it says the election was not called for the wrong winner in any state.

  17. Again: 2000 mules. Watch it, or watch it again. There’s tons of evidence, regardless of what corrupt courts and rhino hacks acknowledge.

  18. Troll moron AZ has at least two fake names. I haven’t seen any evidence that anyone here is either a troll moron or has multiple fake names.

  24. Most likely none, and not just because the KGB only exists in Belarus now. Perhaps unlike troll moron AZ, I speak only for myself.

  26. Woke pedo site is a bad joke, and AZ is the only troll moron known to be using multiple fake names here.

  27. Richard Winger refuses to comment on Ukraine cancelling elections. Sounds like tyranny to me.

  28. He also keeps asking for evidence, then ignoring it and letting AZ bury it under a mountain of gibberish.

  29. One good thing about the electoral college is that the election takes place state by state. This has a number of advantages that even advocates fail to acknowledge. I have already mention that it allows each state to use its own preferred voting method. Maine and Nebraska could not choose electors by districts if this were not so. And, Maine couldn’t use ranked choice voting, or any other voting method, at all.

    Here we see another advantage: Given that the qualifications to get on the ballot vary from state to state, it is possible for even some of the smallest parties to place their candidates on a few states, and for some better organized third parties to get on the ballot in the great majority of states. Having a one-size-fits-all Presidential election means that only a few third parties will get on the ballot nationally, while most of them won’t be on the ballot anywhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.