Colorado Secretary of State Asks U.S. Supreme Court for a Three-Way Oral Argument

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear Anderson v Trump on February 8. As of now, the Court has allotted 30 minutes for attorneys for Donald Trump, and 30 minutes for attorneys for the voters who objected to his ballot inclusion.

on January 26, the Colorado Secretary of State asked the U.S. Supreme Court to give her attorneys fifteen minutes for the Secretary’s argument, so that the oral argument would then become a three-way argument. The Secretary of State wants 15 minutes. Here is her request. It notes that attorneys for the objectors do not consent to her motion, so the Court will need to decide whether or not to grant the Secretary’s request. Trump’s attorneys take no position on the request. The Court will need to decide soon.


Comments

Colorado Secretary of State Asks U.S. Supreme Court for a Three-Way Oral Argument — 10 Comments

  1. Lets do nothing and let the invisible hand fix this with magical unicorn dust.

  2. I might be persuaded to have three way oral with the Colorado and Maine secretaries of state, so long as they are the performers.

  3. Fifteen minutes for Jenna Griswold to spew bovine solids?

    SCOTUS should say no to that.

    Frankly, this case is very simple: A14S3 doesn’t apply to Presidents, else it would say so; A14S3 is not self-executing because of A14S5 and 18 USC 2383, and to be DQed there must be a criminal conviction for violating that statute per A5.

    None of that has happened. Should be summary judgment for Trump.

    (And if it isn’t, then due process is done and so are elections!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.