On January 30, the Colorado voters who had objected to Donald Trump’s ballot position filed this brief with the U.S. Supreme Court. The Colorado voters oppose the request of the Colorado Secretary of State to have her own participation in the oral argument set for February 8.
As things stand now, Trump’s attorneys have 30 minutes, and the objectors have 30 minutes. The Secretary of State wants her attorneys to be able to speak for 15 minutes.
They make a strong argument the Secretary doesn’t really have anything to add they aren’t already covering in terms of defending the general validity of Colorado’s procedures here. No divergent interest there.
Notice a trend the petitioners to remove Trump are establishing. They are showing their own true colors. They want to deny ballot access to a candidate and now censor another party to speak in court in the case. What’s next? They want to hire their own personal private judge and replace the one already on the case? Might as well.
When you are saving the country, you can’t let freedom and the Constitution get in the way.
The Supreme Court has 9 justices, not one. Otherwise correct.
If a state court in another State made a determination that Trump did not engage in insurrection is Colorado obligated to accept that decision?
https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-rep-thomas-massie-confirms-person-who-found-pipe-bomb-at-dnc-on-jan-6th-is-current-u-s-capitol-officer/
Sounds like the FBI to me.
JR–
CA = WY IN STATE SUPREME COURTS ???
ALL THE MORON STATE CASES — FAILURE TO DETECT USA I/R CRIME LAW — USA CRIMINAL JURIS IN USA DIST CTS
= NOOOO JURISDICTION IN MORON STATE COURTS TO RULE ON 14-3 VIOLATIONS. — UNTIL USA I/R CRIME CONVICTION — AND LIKELY FINAL SCOTUS ACTION UPHOLDING CONVICTION.
@AZ,
You bring lawsuit in all 50 states. If there is a decision in any one it applies to all.
SOME OLDE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OPINION IN DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH (WITH ABOUT 10 VOTERS) = SCOTUS 5 OF 9 ???
Uh…sure?