Amicus Curiae that Believes Ninth Amendment Covers Voting Asks to Participate in U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument in Ballot Access Case

On February 5, the amicus curiae group of 3,200 voters that advocates that the Ninth Amendment protects the right of voters to vote freely for the candidate of their choice asked for five minutes of oral argument, in Trump v Anderson, the Colorado ballot access case.

Here is the filing. The Ninth Amendment says, “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” When the Ninth Amendment was written, voters were free to vote for anyone they wished. If the Ninth Amendment means anything, surely it includes rights enjoyed by citizens of the United States when the Ninth Amendment was passed, and which are truly fundamental rights. The right to vote for the candidate of one’s choice meets those criteria.

Many voting rights scholars have wished that there were a constitutional protection explicitly protecting the right to vote. But maybe the Ninth Amendment is that protection. The Ninth Amendment was used to strike down Connecticut’s ban on contraception in 1965, in Griswold v Connecticut.

A U.S. Supreme Court decision finding that the Ninth Amendment protects voting rights would keep both sides somewhat happy. Republicans for the most part want Trump to remain on the ballot, and Democrats want judicial protection for voting rights, or at least certain kinds of voting rights.


Comments

Amicus Curiae that Believes Ninth Amendment Covers Voting Asks to Participate in U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument in Ballot Access Case — 10 Comments

  1. An interesting claim that a Colorado court does not have jurisdiction since the alleged conduct did not occur in Colorado.

  2. TOTAL CON LAW BRAIN DAMAGE SINCE 1776 —

    IF ONE IS AN ELECTOR, THEN ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO VOTE — BY D-E-F-I-N-I-T-I-O-N OF *ELECTOR*.

    2-1 USA REPS
    14-2 AMDT – NOT ENFORCED BY HACK JUDGES SINCE 1868
    15-1 AMDT
    17 AMDT PARA 1 USA SENS
    19 AMDT PARA 1
    24-1 AMDT
    26-1 AMDT
    ———
    PR
    APPV
    TOTSOP

    TRYING TO PERVERT 9 AMDT IS LIKE PERVERSION OF 1 AMDT IN ELECTION STUFF

  3. ANY TRUMP FAKE 12 AMDT ELECTORS IN CO IN 2020-2021 ???

    BIDEN GOT 55.4 PCT OF PREZ VOTES IN CO IN 2020.

  4. “Ninth Amendment reserved rights argument is meritorious. SCOTUS will probably ignore it.”

    Probably correct. They could rule that Trump stays on the ballot without any reference the the 9th Amendment.

  5. When the 9th Amendment was written, voters were free to vote for who they wished. That has nothing to do with who was eligible to be a voter. Obviously, that was much more limited then than now (for good reasons which a lot of people no longer remember).

    The 9th amendment couldn’t conceivably be taken to mean logically the classes of people ineligible to vote then should be eligible to vote now. That would obviously be absurd. Thus, demon rats make such absurd arguments. That’s their specialty.

  6. There are many reasons why Trump should remain on the ballot. Whether the 9th Amendment will be among the ones the Supreme Court will end up using to justify its ultimate decision to keep Trump on the ballot remains to be seen.

    The more important thing is that whatever reasons they end up using, they will keep Him on, because they do not want to start a war. Trump will win the Presidency with or without a war, but hopefully without.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.