Here is the story on another Republican Party-dominated state in which there is a move to ban Ranked Choice Voting statewide.
Thanks to FairVote for the heads up!
Here is the story on another Republican Party-dominated state in which there is a move to ban Ranked Choice Voting statewide.
Thanks to FairVote for the heads up!
Hope this passes. Ranked choice elects commies.
OH LEGIS – 1 OF 50 MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER STATE LEGIS.
—
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
This is the least surprising news so far. Ohio Republicans have made it CRYSTAL CLEAR that the thing they’re least interested in is the will of the people in this state. They can see the writing on the wall from the last few constitutional amendments and ballot initiatives, so they’re going to do everything they can to keep people in Ohio from having any actual say so in anything. They’d ban elections outright if they might have a chance of getting away with it.
A-N-Y OF THE OH GERRYMANDER HACKS GET A MAJORITY IN THE 2022 PRIMARIES ???
OR — A-L-L WERE MINORITY/PLURALITY EXTREMISTS ???
—
ON TOP OF THE RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER DISTS IN GENL ELECTIONS ???
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/05/media/cnn-morning-show-lineup/index.html
PERHAPS IF CNN SPLIT THE *NEWS* FROM ITS NONSTOP COMMUNIST *OPINION* FOLKS, THEN THE RATINGS MIGHT BE A BIT HIGHER.
A-N-Y CNN FOLKS LOOK AT BAN FOR REAL BALLOT ACCESS NEWS ????
The retardedness in this thread other than my comments is off the charts.
Stan is correct.
RCV is idiotic. Voting system is fine how it is.
I agree with Mark. I don’t cared for Ranked Choice Voting.
Good for them.
Do you think the Arnolds, Katherine Gehl, and George Soros think ranked-choice voting will bring about a libertarian society?
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/fairvote/
I tried to post but it disappeared, so let me try again.
@Andy B
We know the answer to that rhetorical question. Thanks for the info. But restricting towns and counties from using a different voting system doesn’t sound libertarian to me.
Who people decide to vote for, and who they’re allowed to vote for, may be more important than the voting method.
Is Ohio allowed to deny funding like this? Like, if a state actually lowered the drinking age to 18 and lost federal funding, what would happen?
MORONS LOVE MINORITY RULE AND RESULTING TYRANTS —
WHO THEN USE SUCH MORONS FOR CANNON FODDER IN FOREIGN/DOMESTIC WARS AND/OR SLAVES – ACTUAL OR MERE TAX SLAVES.
Stan, Bill, Mark, Bobbo and Andy Bakker are the ones making sense here.
Adam Cerini, states restricting towns and counties is a separate argument from libertarianism. If the overall result is less government control over individual people’s lives, it would seem to me to be in line with libertarianism as I understand it.
Not electing commies would seem to be in service of that goal. While keeping government power more local is generally in service of keeping government overall less overgrown and intrusive, that’s not always true.
In this case, if states are keeping towns from implementing voting systems which create fascist communist towns, why wouldn’t it be more libertarian for states to do that?