Home→Uncategorized→Eleven Opinions are Offered as to What Would Happen if the US Supreme Court Rules That Trump is Ineligible for the Ballot or the Presidency
Eleven Opinions are Offered as to What Would Happen if the US Supreme Court Rules That Trump is Ineligible for the Ballot or the Presidency
Eleven Opinions are Offered as to What Would Happen if the US Supreme Court Rules That Trump is Ineligible for the Ballot or the Presidency — 22 Comments
I did not know that Maine SOS Shenna Bellows was a Biden elector in 2020.
If Congress were to find Trump guilty of insurrection and ineligible to hold office as President, then the Vice President-elect would become Acting President and could serve out the entire four year term.
NOOO JUDICIAL POWER IN GERRYMANDER CONGRESS TO FIND IF TRUMP VIOLATED 18 USC 2383 [USA I/R CRIME LAW].
BUT COULD IT IMPEACH HIM AGAIN ??? [DJ 5 AMDT]
AND REMOVE AND DISQUALIFY HIM FROM OFFICE – 1-3-7 ???
Here’s how 2 sentences in the Constitution rose from obscurity to ensnare Donald Trump
—
2021 – CO PROF – 14-3
“If Congress were to find Trump guilty of insurrection and ineligible to hold office as President, then the Vice President-elect would become Acting President and could serve out the entire four year term”
That’s possible, but that could only happen if:
1. Trump is on the ballot, and wins enough electoral votes, and
2. The Democrats actually win a majority of the House delegations by STATE, and
3. Those Democrats actually vote to void Trump’s electoral votes on the day that they are presented to Congress.
4. AND, finally the electoral votes of the Republican candidate for Vice-President have been accepted by the Senate.
POLITICS
Trump is not immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case, US appeals court says
—
AP STORY
HOW SOON BEFORE SCOTUS REALLY DOES ***EMERGENCY*** STUFF ??? — SEE SUMMER 1942 WORLD WAR II
NAZI SPIES LAND IN NY STATE VIA SUBMARINE – CAPTURED. MILITARY COURT MARTIAL.
SCOTUS ACTS- AFFIRMED. SOME HUNG
An ecclesiastical case, perhaps anecdotal, lends support to the Circuit Court’s denial of categorical immunity for Mr. Trump.
The Council of Trent (1545-1563; i.e. “Catholic Counter Reformation”) belatedly sought to shut the barn door after Protestantism was irreversibly let loose. Protestantism itself was in response to theocratic corruptions of faith within the Catholic Church (evidenced in early literature like that of Dante and Chaucer).
The Counter Reformation acknowledged: (1) the pope is not infallible; (2) the pope could err in some cases; (3) a pope can even fall into heresy; (4) and as such, a heretical pope can be deposed. Point being: No one–not even the Pope–holds absolute immunity. All are accountable.
I seem to recall that the 1st Vatican Council recognized the infallibility of the Pope on matters of faith and morals, when and if he speaks “ex cathedra” i.e. “from the chair”, that is, when he sits on his Papal throne and expressly declares that what he is saying is the infallible truth revealed to him by the Holy Spirit.
LIKE SAYING THAT NO DONKEY HACKS WERE IN THE USA CIVIL WAR REBELLION/INSURRECTION IN 1860-1865
—-
ONLY DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS MONSTERS ARE *INFALLIBLE* ??? —-
SEE ENGLAND 1642-1649 CHOP, FRANCE 1789-1792 CHOP, GERMANY 1918, JAPAN 1945
HOW MANY POPES KILLED OFF BY COMPETITORS ???
30 YEARS WAR 1618-1649 — CATHOLIC VS PROTESTANT MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS IN CENTRAL EUROPE
MASS MURDER IN THE NAME OF *RELIGION* — SEE MAIN PEACE TREATY
>>> 1ST AMDT RELIGION CLAUSE. — WORDS AND PHRASES IN THE MAIN TREATY
11 opinions as to what would happen if something that won’t happen were to happen? Doesn’t sound very interesting. It’s obvious what would happen. Armed revolution. Trump’s side would win, very easily.
The Supreme Court isn’t dumb/suicidal enough to go there. Trump will be on the ballot. Trump will win. Trump will be President. Trump will save America.
1857 DRED SCOTT OPIN >>> 1859 JOHN BROWN RAID >>> NOV 1860 LINCOLN ELECTED >>> DEC 1860- FEB 1861 CONFEDS >>> APR 1861 CONFEDS FIRST SHOT AT USA FT SUMTER IN SC >>> 4 PLUS YEARS OF CIVIL WAR >>> 750,000 DEAD >>> 1865-1870 13-14-15 AMDTS
Different court, different times, and it was far from obvious at the time that’s how it would play out. This time, it’s very obvious.
I did not know that Maine SOS Shenna Bellows was a Biden elector in 2020.
She should have recused herself.
Jim has put a good point there.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-scramble-stave-off-defeat-050129623.html
USA REP SANTOS SEAT FEB 13 – SPECIAL ELECTION
HOW MANY $$$ MILLIONS ADDED TO COMMIE NY STATE GDP ???
https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-trump-notable-cases-stand-181835076.html
trump cases
If Congress were to find Trump guilty of insurrection and ineligible to hold office as President, then the Vice President-elect would become Acting President and could serve out the entire four year term.
NOOO JUDICIAL POWER IN GERRYMANDER CONGRESS TO FIND IF TRUMP VIOLATED 18 USC 2383 [USA I/R CRIME LAW].
BUT COULD IT IMPEACH HIM AGAIN ??? [DJ 5 AMDT]
AND REMOVE AND DISQUALIFY HIM FROM OFFICE – 1-3-7 ???
https://apnews.com/article/trump-14th-amendment-insurrection-supreme-court-colorado-2b9d5b628cb2779fc84212cdc651e4e7
Here’s how 2 sentences in the Constitution rose from obscurity to ensnare Donald Trump
—
2021 – CO PROF – 14-3
“If Congress were to find Trump guilty of insurrection and ineligible to hold office as President, then the Vice President-elect would become Acting President and could serve out the entire four year term”
That’s possible, but that could only happen if:
1. Trump is on the ballot, and wins enough electoral votes, and
2. The Democrats actually win a majority of the House delegations by STATE, and
3. Those Democrats actually vote to void Trump’s electoral votes on the day that they are presented to Congress.
4. AND, finally the electoral votes of the Republican candidate for Vice-President have been accepted by the Senate.
FLASH-FLASH-FLASH
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-not-immune-prosecution-2020-150956012.html
Trump is not immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case, US appeals court says
—
ON TO SCOTUS
FLASH — MORE
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=141118
3 JUDGE COURT ORDER
— ZILLION STORIES LATER TODAY
TIME RUNNING O-U-T FOR TYRANT TRUMP DELAYS — WHEELS OF JUSTICE GRINDING HIM TO BITS ???
AS WITH USA/FRANCE ARMIES IN 1781 IN VIRGINIA
AS WITH UNION ARMY RE CONFEDS IN 1864-1865
AS WITH ALLIES ON WESTERN FRONT IN 1918
AS WITH ALLIES ON ALL FRONTS IN 1945
FLASH- MORE 2
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24409134/read-trump-immunity-ruling.pdf
3 JUDGE CT OP
FLASH- MORE 3
https://apnews.com/article/trump-capitol-riot-presidential-immunity-appeal-46c2d7fc7807cd3262764d35e47f390e
POLITICS
Trump is not immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case, US appeals court says
—
AP STORY
HOW SOON BEFORE SCOTUS REALLY DOES ***EMERGENCY*** STUFF ??? — SEE SUMMER 1942 WORLD WAR II
NAZI SPIES LAND IN NY STATE VIA SUBMARINE – CAPTURED. MILITARY COURT MARTIAL.
SCOTUS ACTS- AFFIRMED. SOME HUNG
An ecclesiastical case, perhaps anecdotal, lends support to the Circuit Court’s denial of categorical immunity for Mr. Trump.
The Council of Trent (1545-1563; i.e. “Catholic Counter Reformation”) belatedly sought to shut the barn door after Protestantism was irreversibly let loose. Protestantism itself was in response to theocratic corruptions of faith within the Catholic Church (evidenced in early literature like that of Dante and Chaucer).
The Counter Reformation acknowledged: (1) the pope is not infallible; (2) the pope could err in some cases; (3) a pope can even fall into heresy; (4) and as such, a heretical pope can be deposed. Point being: No one–not even the Pope–holds absolute immunity. All are accountable.
I seem to recall that the 1st Vatican Council recognized the infallibility of the Pope on matters of faith and morals, when and if he speaks “ex cathedra” i.e. “from the chair”, that is, when he sits on his Papal throne and expressly declares that what he is saying is the infallible truth revealed to him by the Holy Spirit.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/matt-gaetz-leads-republican-resolution-183552409.html
GOP INFAMY
LIKE SAYING THAT NO DONKEY HACKS WERE IN THE USA CIVIL WAR REBELLION/INSURRECTION IN 1860-1865
—-
ONLY DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS MONSTERS ARE *INFALLIBLE* ??? —-
SEE ENGLAND 1642-1649 CHOP, FRANCE 1789-1792 CHOP, GERMANY 1918, JAPAN 1945
HOW MANY POPES KILLED OFF BY COMPETITORS ???
30 YEARS WAR 1618-1649 — CATHOLIC VS PROTESTANT MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS IN CENTRAL EUROPE
MASS MURDER IN THE NAME OF *RELIGION* — SEE MAIN PEACE TREATY
>>> 1ST AMDT RELIGION CLAUSE. — WORDS AND PHRASES IN THE MAIN TREATY
11 opinions as to what would happen if something that won’t happen were to happen? Doesn’t sound very interesting. It’s obvious what would happen. Armed revolution. Trump’s side would win, very easily.
The Supreme Court isn’t dumb/suicidal enough to go there. Trump will be on the ballot. Trump will win. Trump will be President. Trump will save America.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/more-78-friends-supreme-court-194311142.html
MERE 78 AMICUS BRIEFS IN TRUMP 14-3 CASE
Not even the supreme court itself cares.
SCOTUS HACKS WENT THERE ONCE —
1857 DRED SCOTT OPIN >>> 1859 JOHN BROWN RAID >>> NOV 1860 LINCOLN ELECTED >>> DEC 1860- FEB 1861 CONFEDS >>> APR 1861 CONFEDS FIRST SHOT AT USA FT SUMTER IN SC >>> 4 PLUS YEARS OF CIVIL WAR >>> 750,000 DEAD >>> 1865-1870 13-14-15 AMDTS
Different court, different times, and it was far from obvious at the time that’s how it would play out. This time, it’s very obvious.