Indiana Supreme Court Hears Primary Ballot Access Case

On February 12, the Indiana Supreme Court heard State ex rel Rust v Morales, the lawsuit over the new law that says a candidate can’t get on a primary ballot unless he or she voted in the last two primaries, and in each case, chose the primary ballot of that party. The plaintiff, John Rust, won in the lower court, and the state appealed. See this story.


Comments

Indiana Supreme Court Hears Primary Ballot Access Case — 6 Comments

  1. Every election is a unique event for voters and candidates. Both should be free of indentured servitude to any past political affiliations or non-affiliations. People must able to change with changing political situations. One may think of oneself as a Democrat in an election when 18 and a Republican in an election when 22 and an Independent when 28 and a Libertarian at 32. Previous voluntary affiliations must be voluntarily revocable with every ballot one casts. Voters without autonomy cannot cast authentic ballots.
    Rebel against anti-choice fascism.

  2. It is looking more and more to be the case that in order to support the freedom of association of political parties asserted in Eu v San Francisco, the entire nomination process needs to be privatized.

  3. WZ-

    NOOO EXTREMIST CAUCUSES / PRIMARIES / CONVENTIONS

    NOMINATE VIA EQUAL NOM PETS / FILING FEES
    ONE ELECTION DAY
    PR
    APPV
    TOTSOP

    EXTREMIST PARTIES CAN HAVE THEIR 4 JULY CIRCULAR FIRING SQUADS / SUPERBOWL DRUNK PARTIES

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.