Utah Files Brief in Defense of its Ban on Paying Petitioners on a Per-Signature Basis

On February 5, Utah filed this brief in defense of its law that prohibits paying initiative petition circulators on a per-signature basis. Maxfield v Henderson, 4:23cv-112. The state also defends its law that requires initiative circulators to wear a badge that says if they are being paid or not. The badge does not identify the circulator.


Comments

Utah Files Brief in Defense of its Ban on Paying Petitioners on a Per-Signature Basis — 10 Comments

  1. I can’t see what difference it makes for a petition signature gatherer to wear something that identifies them as paid or not. What are they going to have to wear next. A badge that indicates if they wiped their ass within the last 24 hours?

  2. BIGDADDY —

    HOW ABOUT VIDEOTAPE OF LIFE HISTORY ???

    GERRYMANDER TYRANTS WANT NOOOO OPPOSITION TO THEIR TYRANNY.

    ONE MORE REASON FOR ONE VOTER PETITION FORMS

  3. A pay per signature ban in Colorado got thrown out in court, as did a ban on out of state petition curculators.

  4. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY BROWN V BOARD OF ED 1954.

    PRE SKOOOOOOOOOOOL MORONS NEVER USE THAT ARGUMENT TO HACK JUDGES

    I AM A PATHETIC OLD MAN WITH NO FRIENDS AND NO LIFE

    MY ASS HURTS

  5. I don’t care if they get paid. What’s important to know is if they are Jews, or are being paid by the Jews. It might also help to know whether they are LDS church members in good standing. That should certainly hold up in court if this somehow doesn’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.