Law Professor David Schultz Says Attempt to Remove Legal Marijuana Now Party May Violate Due Process

Minnesota law professor David Schultz has written that the Democratic Party’s attempt to remove the Legal Marijuana Now Party from this year’s ballot probably violates due process.  There are court precedents that states cannot toughen ballot access rules in the middle of the election season, including one that was summarily affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court, Hudler v Austin, from Michigan, 1976.  See this story.


Comments

Law Professor David Schultz Says Attempt to Remove Legal Marijuana Now Party May Violate Due Process — 10 Comments

  1. Every time we’d think we were getting something to eat, someone would yank it away at the last second.

  2. I uses to want recreational marijuana to be legalized. Now that it is I wish it wasn’t.

  3. NOOO MENTION OF ELECTIONS OR ELECTION TIME SPANS IN 14-1 AMDT

    — DP – ELECTION DATES == MORE UNCON JUDICIAL LEGISLATION — JUST LIKE PURCELL OP JUNK

  4. 2024 TROLL MORON PRE-SKOOOL VERSION OF OLDE 1938 MOVIE – REEFER MADNESS ???

    LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS FOR ADULTS –

    TREAT ADULTS LIKE ADULTS.

    TOTAL LIABILITY OF DRUG USERS FOR ANY RESULTING CRIMES/TORTS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.