John Rust Brings Indiana Primary Ballot Access Case to U.S. Supreme Court

John Rust, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Indiana this year, but who was kept off the primary ballot, has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal.  Rust v Morales.  When the cert petition is posted on the U.S. Supreme Court, this post will be amended to include a link.

He was kept off the primary ballot because of a new law that said no one could be on a primary ballot who had not voted in that same party’s primary in previous years.  He had won in the state trial court, but then the Indiana Supreme Court had reversed.

See this story.


Comments

John Rust Brings Indiana Primary Ballot Access Case to U.S. Supreme Court — 10 Comments

  1. What about someone who moved from a state which doesn’t have primaries? Or which has a top X primary, etc.

  2. Q-

    MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS IN DE FACTO CONTROL WILL USE ALL MEANS POSSIBLE [AMP] TO STOP/DEFEAT OPPONENTS —-

    GERRYMANDERS
    UNEQUAL BALLOT ACCESS LAWS
    PARTY LEADERS PICKING CANDIDATES – ESP IN RIGGED CAUCUSES / PRIMARIES / CONVENTIONS
    ETC

    IE USA MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS = SAME AS FOREIGN MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS

    PR
    APPV
    TOTSOP

  3. RE TRUMP *IMMUNITY* CASE — ESP FOR CURRENT/FORMER USA MILITARY FOLKS —

    DETECT ****** LAWFUL ****** — ONE RESULT OF POST WW II — AXIS WAR CRIMES TRIALS
    ———–
    UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE — US CODE TITLE 10 PART

    10 §891. Art. 91. Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer
    Any warrant officer or enlisted member who-
    (1) strikes or assaults a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, while that officer is in the execution of his office;
    (2) willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer; or
    (3) treats with contempt or is disrespectful in language or deportment toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, while that officer is in the execution of his office;

    shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
    (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68 .)


    10 §892. Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation
    Any person subject to this chapter who-
    (1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;
    (2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or
    (3) is derelict in the performance of his duties;

    shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
    (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 68 .)
    —-
    MORE DEAD LANGUAGE IN USA LAWS ???

  4. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/europe/france-far-right-brink-of-power-what-next-intl/index.html

    CNN RE FRANCE ELECTION– POSSIBLE RIGHT WING REGIME ???

    WEATHER IN FRANCE NEXT 10 DAYS ???

    WHOLE COUNTRY GOES ON VACATION IN AUGUST — N-O-T THIS YEAR ???

    OLDE 4TH REPUBLIC — SEE AUG 1914 – START OF WW I — ALL MILITARY LEAVES CANCELLED IN FRANCE – ALL RESERVES CALLED TO THE GERMAN/BELGIUM FRONT.
    FIGHT THE HUNS — FOR 4 PLUS YEARS — TO 11 NOV 1918 VICTORY.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.