Reuters seems to have conducted to first poll for president listing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee. When only Donald Trump and Harris are mentioned, Harris leaders Trump by two points. But when Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is included, Harris leads Trump by four points, with Kennedy at 8%. See here.
FAKE NEWS FROM LEFT WING REUTERS.
Richard Winger is obviously all in for Harris.
Well that’s really fake. Kamala’s record is going to come back and smack her right in the face.
This is Babylon Bee level of accuracy. Actually, the Bee is more accurate.
https://babylonbee.com/news/donald-trump-will-destroy-democracy-says-party-endorsing-candidate-that-didnt-receive-a-single-vote
Speaking of the Babylon Bee…
POLLS IN 7-10 MARGINAL EC AREAS
REST MEAN LITTLE
Reuters which predicted Clinton would defeat Trump by 5 or 6 points?
This post is meant to illustrate the stupidity of the national Democratic Party. It is trying to get Kennedy off the ballot in many states, but why?
Kennedy polling 8% only after Biden dropped put
Something doesn’t add up
Richard Winger or anyone else
Who is to stop thr democraric party to pay the polling companies to keep Rafak Jr’s numbers down
Is there any way to prevent this,?
I assume even an electronic public record request to the state of email exhcamys between the polling company like Monmouth and its donors may not work?
Thank you
David, if you owned a polling company, would you accept a bribe to publish false data? I presume your answer is “no.” So why do you presume that other polling company owners are so evil, when you yourself are not evil? That is a big problem today in the United States. Trump supporters say they do not support voter fraud and would not commit it. I believe them. But then why do Trump supporters assume that Democrats are unlike them when it comes to morality? We are all the same species. If you aren’t evil, then you should presume that basically your fellow human beings are not evil either. We are alike inside. But we don’t seem to know that.
Richard Winger
I am sure your aware as liberatarian of the corrupt.merger of state and corporate
Large university institutions do.tske large amounts of donations grom.chatoty as well.as donors and some of them do.jave a vested interested as oligarchs like black rock?the military industrial.complex and its influence Washington
Is it inconceivable to believe that the pollsters and the deep.state may have vested interests to keep rfk jr out
I’ll give you an example recent poling questions from Monmouth are framed in a way Do you believe the courts this
Do you believe the courts that..im.refefemnce to.Donald Trumo
You can tell.their biased on mainstream polling narratives
Why not values of progressives and libertarians
Our civil liberties,censorship,,forever wars,free speech
Rfk jr is a viable candidate and they ahould fairly include him in a three way
He was doing well hitting 4 polls till.late June
Then CNN pulls out Debate Criteria and then BAm…The Marquete Poll.at 17% was the final one
Was this a coincidence given bdiens debate performance
Seems like someone is pulling the strings Richard.
Like lobbyist have power to influenced politicians and corporations and govt
Is it Inconveivabke that some of these pollsters could get Zelled a million or 2 from the DNC?
That’s why poll averages are useful. RCP and 538 show the poll averages for Kennedy are around 8-9%.
As for good and evil, there’s a lot of evil within each one of us, and there’s a lot of evil in the world. When you’ve seen things like totalitarian dictatorship, war, gang rape, torture, domestic violence, human trafficking, etc, etc first hand, it’s pretty hard to deny it. If you don’t do all the worst things you’ve ever seen yourself, it’s erroneous to conclude that nobody does them. Even if you’ve lived a sheltered life and never seen evil done, certainly you’ve read and otherwise learned of it all throughout your life.
@Richard Winger
“We are all the same species. If you aren’t evil, then you should presume that basically your fellow human beings are not evil either. We are alike inside.”
This is a false premise, likely resulting from neo-humanism or some similar error. When it comes to Faith or religion, it is sometimes called pluralism, indifferentism, perennialism, etc.; in philosophy trivialism, perennialism, etc. In the former case it is considered a heresy at best, in the latter a (logical) fallacy.
It isn’t very difficult to determine whether someone is evil, because there are quite a few litmus tests for them to fail:
Is abortion ever acceptable under any circumstances? Are there more than two sexes? Can you change your sex through surgery and/or hormone therapy? Does gender ever differ from sex? Is it alright to judge individuals based on their race? Are you a feminist or do you support feminism? Do you believe in centralization? What about collectivism? Globalism? Should government be bigger? Do you believe “Ukraine” is a country and “Ukrainians” are a people, rather than a genocidal terrorist movement? What about “Palestine”?
These are only a few of the questions that one could ask; but if someone answers yes to any of these, then they are evil – at least regarding that particular topic, but it is likely that they are evil (whether through ignorance or willfully) on other topics as well.
Left wing Quinnipiac has Trump up 2 over Harris. That means he’s probably up 4 to 6 points.
The Democrats will do anything to keep Trump out, even attempt to kill him. A Trump supporter was beaten recently over putting a sign in his yard. A freakin sign. This is how unhinged the left is.
Richard Winger has openly said how much he hates Trump. He also voted for Harris as a Senator. That tells you all you need to know on where he really stands.
Exepct more anti Trump and pro Harris stuff over the next three and a half months.
Articles of impeachment have been filed against Harris for covering up Dementia Joe’s obvious mental decline.
I have never voted for any Democrat for US Senator or Governor. It is nonsensical for you to make an assertion for which you have no information. The same goes for your imagined attitude about me and Donald Trump.
Reality, the point of blogging polls is not to show whether Trump or Harris is leading; it is to show the effect of the minor party and independent candidates in the race.
It must be a coincidence that the polls which show Trump leading don’t earn headlines here.
As for the point you are trying to demonstrate, the polls are a deceptive snapshot in time. Trump has more of a hardcore support base, which means that the third party or independent candidates have more room to grow at Harris expense than at Trump’s. Democrats are right to worry.
MORE FOLKS LYING TO POLLSTERS THAN EVER ???
No, 2022 was pretty on the nose. Pollsters are getting better at accounting for communication technology changes and who is currently likely to vote.