Chris Churchill, who has been a 3-times per week columnist at the Albany Times-Union since 2012, has this column about the Democratic Party’s efforts to keep Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., off the New York ballot. The Albany Times-Union is the daily newspaper for New York’s capital city, and is the location of the state court that is weighing the challenge.
The column may be behind a pay wall,, but it says, “The RFK Jr. lawsuit is really about disenfranchising voters…The Democratic-aligned group doesn’t really care where he lives. It just wants to rob New Yorkers of choice.” It also points out that according to the most recent poll for the presidential election in New York state, 7% of voters want to vote for Kennedy.
Archived copy: https://archive.ph/exOzH
Based columnist.
Based on bs
Sometimes, a false spoiler choice has to be removed – like poison sold as food or medicine on store shelves – to preserve our ability to make choices in the future. If the spoiler enables the magats, there won’t be any choices except armed resistance or terrorized submission to a tyrannical fascist dictatorship with a cult of personality fuehrer.
Keeping people from voting freely for the candidate of their choice is an element of dictatorship. It’s the same thinking that caused the U.S. government to put Japanese ancestry people on the west coast in concentration camps. “we have to”. Two wrongs don’t make a right.
It’s the same thinking that caused the George W. Bush administration to torture our prisoners. “we have to.”
By the same logic, arsenic labeled as ginger ale should be on grocery store shelves..People should have the right to buy it and drink it, even if that means they don’t get to make any other choices again.
911 SUSPECTS STILL IN USA JAILS — WITH NOOOO TRIALS/CONVICTIONS
TOTAL SUBVERSION OF USA CONST – ALLOWED BY SCOTUS HACKS
AS WITH ALL THE UN-DECLARED USA WARS BEFORE/SINCE 1945 – END OF WW II
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/11/rfk-jr-nebraska-ballot-independent/74590253007/
RFKJR ON NE BALLOTS
ABOVE AVERAGE BIG DEAL DUE TO NE 4 GERRYMANDER DISTS – 1 EC VOTE EACH -ESP THE BIDEN WON 2020 DIST
Keeping voters from having the “wrong” choices on the ballot is the sole motive of the duopoly in passing ballot access censorship laws. Any candidate the ruling elite doubts they can control is “a spoiler” for the regime.
Richard,
Thank you from the bottom of my heart ❤️ for your support for the Kennedy campaign. We so appreciate what you’ve been doing for us and also for your recent super-generous contribution.
Folks, please join America’s favorite podcaster Joe Rogan and America’s ballot expert Richard Winger in becoming a financial backer of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Before you forget, go now to Kennedy24.com and give what you can. Thank you for your love 💕 ♥️
Winger donated to Kennedy? Shouldn’t that be disclosed?
D. Frank Robinson, wrong choices exist, like murder and rape and theft. All of those are choices. They are not involuntary actions. The people who make these choices have the choice to make other choices.
It would be wrong for society to allow them to make these choices without consequences, because their choices take away choices from other people.
Likewise, mickey mouse parties and candidates do nothing except elect the fascist psychopath magats who would commit choices like murder, rape, and theft on a mass scale through a tyrannical fascist dictatorship that will do away with elections or make them a joke.
Therefore, it would be wrong for society to not remove the mickey mouse officeseekeers who have no chance of actually winning from ballots. It would be even better to take the magats off the ballots, but unfortunately we don’t have the collective political will to do that yet.
MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER SYSTEMS IN USA-
USA H REPS
USA SENATE
USA 12 AMDT EC
ALL 50 STATE LEGIS
MANY LOCAL LEGIS BODIES
1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 GERRYMANDER AREAS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL
MUCH WORSE PRIMARY / CONVENTION MATH — ABOUT 5-12 PCT
RESULT LAWLESS EXECS- PREZS, GUVS, LOCAL EXECS
ALSO HACK COURTS IF EXECS INVOLVED IN GETTING COURT HACKS INTO OFFICE – ORIGINALS OR REPLACEMENTS
1787 USA REGIME- ONE MORE LATE DARK AGE REGIME WITH MULTIPLE FATAL / TYRANT DEFECTS –
BUILT ON THE WRECKAGE OF THE FATAL DEFECTS OF THE EMERGENCY 1777 ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION.
—
PR
NONPARTISAN EXECS/JUDICS — APPV
TOTSOP
RIGGED COMMIE DONKEY CONVENTION NEXT MONDAY.
WHO WILL SHOW UP —
OTHER THAN MONARCHS / OLIGARCHS / PROTESTORS ???
— AND A ZILLION COPS / SPIES / ETC.
People own their own votes, and are entitled to vote for whom they please. Names printed on ballots should be considered merely advisory, and voters should always retain the right to cast a write-in vote.
All qualified parties should be able to place the names of their candidates on the ballot with or without primaries or nomination papers, as they choose. Under Eu v San Francisco, parties should be considered to own their own lines on the ballot, and should be able to control who can or cannot run on them, to include whether or not they might be fusion or “sore-loser” candidates.
If major parties fear that they might lose elections because so-called “spoiler” candidates allegedly “take” their votes under plurality voting, then they have two options:
1 Run better candidates with wider appeal. or
2. Support run-off, or alternative voting methods to minimize the impact of so-called “spoilers.”
There should be no ballots to print any names on.
Richard,
-PLEASE LINK THE OPION OF albany, ny judge in case.
I agree with Standing Count Stan.