On August 23, a hearings officer for the Illinois State Board of Elections ruled that petitioners who circulate for a Democratic or Republican candidate in another state are not eligible to circulate an independent or minor party petition in Illinois that same year. But, circulators who worked on an independent or minor party petition in another state can then work on an independent or minor party petition in Illinois that same year.
No other state tries to prevent a circulator from working because of that circulator’s activity in another state the same year. Petitioning is First Amendment activity, and the ruling begs for a lawsuit to overturn it. But because the hearings officer also determined that the petition at issue, the Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. independent petition, still has enough valid signatures, there will be no lawsuit this year.
The hearings officer ruled that Kennedy has 33,286 valid signatures, which is more than the required 25,000. Many of Kennedy’s Illinois petitioners had worked for him in other states, and so their work was valid. A smaller number of signatures which had been gathered by Kennedy’s Illinois petitioners in other states this year for various Democratic and Republican presidential primary petitions are not valid.
Here is the report of the hearings officer.
Here is the appendix to the report, which contains the conclusion that some type of out-of-state work doesn’t matter, but other types do matter. The Appendix says on page 40 that the fact that Kennedy was registered as a Democrat in New York does not disqualify him from being an independent candidate in Illinois. On pages 74-76, it says that the fact that he may have given a false address does not disqualify his petitions, because the address was not sworn to. On page 78 it says the fact that Kennedy is a minor party nominee in certain states does not disqualify him from being an independent candidate in Illinois.
If they worked on any kind of petition in another state, their whole petition should be thrown out.
There ought to be a lawsuit over this.
MUST SUE FOR $$$ DAMAGES — TO BANKRUPT HACKS SUBVERTING CONST RIGHTS
USA 28 USC 1331 / 42 USC 1983
Andy, there is. It is in federal court and is pending.
If our side wins the lawsuit would it also throw out the rule that says that anyone who worked a Democratic or Republican primary candidate petition in Illinois is barred from working a minor party or independent candidate petition there, or is this lawsuit only pertaining to apply this ban to people who did this in other states?
Does the ban only apply to professional petition circulators or does it also apply to professional yard sign printers? (rhetorical question)
33k is historically a very thin margin in Illinois given their many grounds for invalidation.
That is of course if and when a challenge happens. But if it does that’s a state where you need a lot more margin to be safe.