Wisconsin Supreme Court Will Hear Kennedy Appeal, on Whether Stickers Should be Used to Cover His Name on Ballot

Posted on by September 20, 2024

The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear Robert F. Kennedy, Jr’s appeal on whether his name should be covered up on the ballot with stickers. He argues that he should be allowed to vanish from the ballot, arguing Equal Protection. Independent candidates can’t withdraw after the filing deadline, but qualified parties have a month additional time to revise their nominees. See this story.

Comments

Wisconsin Supreme Court Will Hear Kennedy Appeal, on Whether Stickers Should be Used to Cover His Name on Ballot — 22 Comments

  2. Cheap? Stickers seem like they would be an enormous waste of time and money. Much easier just to print the ballots without his name.

  5. @AZ,

    Vote machine manufacturers can make more money if their machines can process ballots sticky with jam and marmalade.

    Jammer Scanner Alabammer

  6. Woah, Dominion. Bramble jam!
    Woah, Dominion. Paper jam!
    They’re from Birmingham. (They’re not.) Election scam!
    Way down in Alabam. (They’re actually from Toronto.) Democratic sham!
    When they’re stealing that thing. Caught on cam!
    Boy, they make me sing. May God them damn!
    Woah Dominion. Bramble jam!
    Woah Dominion. Paper jam!

  7. VOTE MACHINE BIZ HAVE ANY INTERNAL POETS ON BDS OF DIRECTORS ???

    NUMBER OF BAN FOLKS SHOULD APPLY FOR POSITIONS.

  8. There would no basis to litigate for a candidate to withdraw their candidacy with a write-in ballot. The candidate can simply announce that if elected, they will not serve, thereby making any votes written in for them null and void.

  9. https://www.yahoo.com/news/court-rules-nearly-98-000-011820197.html

    Court rules nearly 98,000 Arizonans whose citizenship hadn’t been confirmed can vote the full ballot
    SEJAL GOVINDARAO
    Fri, September 20, 2024 at 9:18 PM EDT

    PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Friday that nearly 98,000 people whose citizenship documents hadn’t been confirmed can vote in state and local races.
    The court’s decision comes after officials uncovered a database error that for two decades mistakenly designated the voters as having access to the full ballot.
    ——
    ANY STATE/DC NOT HAVING A MAJOR E LAW CASE THIS YEAR ???

    HOW MANY ZILLION DATABASE *ERRORS* — FOR DECADES ??? — ELECTIONS — NON-ELECTIONS [ESP IN NATL SECURITY AND CRIMES]

  10. What every state should do is if another candidate on the ballot (like Kennedy) endorses another candidate officially (like Trump) to just add Kennedy votes to Trumps for a grand total. Problem solved.

  14. @Bob

    It’s even more interesting than it appears at first glance.

    The Arizona Democrats seem to have had it all planned out, so that if illegals are now prevented from voting, then they will ensure that the Republican majority of voters who got their driver’s licenses replaced without being informed of the impact this has on their ability to vote in state and local elections, will also be prevented from voting.

    Quite clever, you have to admit.

  17. ONE MORE IF-THEN THING ON A ELECTION FLOW CHART.

    IF FOOD JELLY JAM ON BALLOTS CAUSES SCANNER MACHINE JAM, THEN IS THERE A NEW ELECTION ???

  22. Jim, “Russian troll disinformation” has turned out to be indisputably accurate far more often than the actual disinformation put out by the outlets of coordinated propaganda which label it as such. Your “trusted news sources” are the real troll disinformation.

    You have fallen for a fake news scam – the legacy establishment media. Their attempts at information gatekeeping are failing ever more spectacularly. Even though some people such as you still fall for those attempts, the proportion of people who do is shrinking at an accelerating rate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.