Although No Labels dropped out of the 2024 presidential race on April 4, two of its election-related lawsuits are still pending.
In Arizona, the Ninth Circuit expects to hear No Labels v Fontes during January. This is the lawsuit over whether a party has a Freedom of Association right to block anyone from running in its primary, if the party doesn’t want any candidates for particular offices. No Labels had won this case in U.S. District Court.
In Delaware, discovery is proceeding in No Labels v NoLabels.com, a trademark dispute between No Labels and a parody website.
When you don’t use lube, sometimes it takes a while.
https://ballot-access.org/2024/09/29/september-2024-ballot-access-news-print-edition/#comment-1254025
“The libertarian transparency caucus” strikes again. Air all your party dirty laundry with endless outrage (under the guise of providing in depth coverage of all US minor parties), but brook no correction (even as to format errors or misquotes) and certainly no dissenting views, even if only occasionally dissenting.
Transparency for thee but not for me Phillies strikes again. Apparently, politbureauesque information control and blackholing is “model true libertarian” (or is that modal?)
Phillies is as bad as Sarwark,Bilyeu, and attention whore Caryn Ann Harlos.
Much worse.