In 2006, a U.S. District Court in Ohio struck down Ohio laws that say when a voter is challenged at the polls on the grounds of citizenship, he or she must produce proof of citizenship on the spot, at the polls. Afterwards, Ohio election officials stopped doing that, and instead someone who is challenged must be allowed to vote upon stating under penalty of perjury that he or she is eligible.
But in October 2024, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose revived the old procedures, not withstanding the 2006 decision. Here is the brief filed by the ACLU to stop the Secretary’s recent action. The action is filed in the original 2006 lawsuit, which is now called Boustani v LaRose, n.d., 1:06cv-2065. It is not known which U.S. District Court judge has the case.
LaRose is certainly a crook, as seen from his ridiculous signature rejection rate and games with keeping Stein off the ballot, but this is ridiculous.
There should be voter ID at the polls, so of course that should include proof of citizenship.
How many people who perjured themselves to vote, were ever prosecuted let alone convicted for it?
Conflict between state and federal law.
sue for $$$ damages to bankrupt hacks
OLDE BIRTH CERTIFICATES DO N-O-T LIST NATION-STATE STATUS OF ALLEGED FATHERS
>>> TOTAL LACK OF PROOF FOR MANY FOLKS THAT THEY ARE USA CITIZENS
BIT BETTER RECORDS FOR OFFSPRING OF FOLKS WHO HAS NATURALIZED CITIZEN – FATHERS.
IE MASSIVE DNA CITIZEN TESTS MAY BE COMING — WHO IS/WAS YOUR DADA AND EARLIER DADAS — AND THE NATION-STATE STATUS OF EACH IN THE ALLEGIANCE CHAIN.
The azbot’s fantasy bullshit garbage in, garbage out output is occasionally funny.
This is one of those times.