Cornel West Loses Pennslvania Ballot Access in Third Circuit, Then Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Direct That Notices be Posted in Polling Places Mentioning Write-in Option

Posted on by October 31, 2024

On October 30, the Third Circuit refused to put Cornel West on the ballot as an independent presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. West v Pennsylvania Department of State, 24-2913. The panel only wrote one sentence, saying the request is denied.

The case was before Judges Patty Shwartz (Obama appointee), Paul B. Matey (Trump), and Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves (Biden).

The same day, West asked the U.S. Supreme Court to order the Pennsylvania Secretary of State to direct that notices be posted in all polling places, telling voters that Cornel West is a write-in candidate and explaining that voters may cast a write=in vote. Here is that filing. 24A427.

Comments

Cornel West Loses Pennslvania Ballot Access in Third Circuit, Then Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Direct That Notices be Posted in Polling Places Mentioning Write-in Option — 22 Comments

  9. All candidate voting should be by write-in only. No state censorship by picking and excluding whose name gets printed on the ballot. The individual voter must have the exclusive say by putting a name on the ballot or voting for no candidate and leaving the office vacant. But that might upset the fascist police state.

  12. Commies and fascists are on the same side: Cumdumpallina Herass and CCP Assistant Coach Timmy Smallest Violin Waltz.

  15. Richard doesn’t care. He has openly stated all votes should count no matter what, fraud, illegals, or otherwise.

  17. @DFR
    Can we settle for something like:

    “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of who or what the vote was cast for.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.